IBJNews

Lawyers in Simon estate case fight over what should be public

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Attorneys for Melvin Simon’s daughter Deborah, who’s seeking to throw out the final version of the late billionaire’s estate plan, argued in court Wednesday for public disclosure of his and wife Bren’s financial and spending records.

During a 90-minute session before Hamilton Superior Court Judge William J. Hughes, attorneys for Bren Simon argued for limited disclosure of the information, including Bren’s spending practices, calling it highly personal.

Barry Simon, an attorney for Deborah who is not related to the family, suggested the public disclosure might favor his client, who’s seeking to have her stepmother, Bren, removed as trustee in charge of handling Melvin’s fortune.

“How [Bren] handled the finances or treated Mel Simon might be embarrassing to her,” but should be disclosed, Barry Simon said during the first major hearing in the estate battle.

Deborah is asking the court to throw out changes to Melvin’s estate plan executed in February 2009, seven months before he died at age 82. She contends he was suffering from dementia and didn't understand what he was doing when he signed off on the plan, boosting the share of his fortune going directly to Bren from one-third to one-half.

The changes also wiped out a portion that was to go to Deborah and his two other children from his first marriage—Cynthia Simon-Skjodt and David Simon, the chairman and CEO of Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group.

Bren, 66, who married Melvin in 1972, contends the changes fully reflected Melvin’s wishes.

David and Cynthia are not plaintiffs in the litigation. But attorneys for Deborah acknowledged they’re also representing the other two siblings, and expect both to testify at trial. Barry Simon asked the judge to allow Deborah's legal team to disclose documents the court determines should be sealed to David and Cynthia.

An attorney for Bren Simon, David Beehler, bristled at the suggestion, saying the siblings were never entitled to see Mel and Bren's financial information, even when they were living together years ago.

"If their interest is that strong and heartfelt, they should be willing to join as parties," Beehler said.

Attorneys for the two sides kept Wednesday’s hearing civil. But they’ve been sparring over nearly every aspect of the litigation, and during the session an attorney for Deborah cast doubt on whether the two sides would be ready for trial in January 2011, as is currently scheduled.

Melvin Simon was co-founder of Simon Property Group and one of Indiana’s richest men. The value of his principal investment, Simon Property shares, has zoomed higher over the past year, perhaps swelling his fortune to $2 billion.

Hughes said this already has been an extraordinary case. The judge said it’s difficult to keep case files on his desk for more than five minutes because media and other outside parties keep requesting them. He said litigation related to the estate already has increased the workload of his court by one-third.

He is expected to rule soon on how to handle confidential documents. Attorneys for Deborah acknowledge some information, such as bank account numbers, should be kept from public view. But they opposed wholesale sealing of documents containing financial information.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • WHO"S JEFF
    WHO'S JEFF AND DAVID. Well we know who David is but who the heck is Jeff??
  • Nothing's Sacred Anymore
    Gee, you'd think somewhere along the line someone would have the (legal) right not to have the matter totally aired in public.
  • bren
    I thing bren should be shame of herself,making people thing that was mr.simon last wish. If he want the will change he would had change it when they first got marriag Bren 40 year ago.I hope Deborah prove to the court that wills is fake, and show the court that a peron have dementia dont remmeber they always go back in the past.
  • How about Deborah Simon anty'ing up
    her financial records, ALL sources of income and spending patterns for the last thirty years.

    Mel would be rolling over in his grave, wishing he had simply videotaped his request that his ungrateful, entitlement-syndrome daughter not be happy with all the accolades he already provided her. Next thing you know Deborah will be trying to undo Tammy's adoption. The only thing about any of this that makes me smile is knowing Jeff and David dont' get to have access to the cash for inveseting. HAHA!

    My parents are spending my inheritance and I am glad to watch them do so. After all, it's their money to do with what they want. That's why I have a job and live within my means, and yes, by the way, I am a millionaire. The difference is I earned it myself and do not expect anything from my parents.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT