IBJNews

Lobbying commission fires executive director after leave

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Lobby Registration Commission on Thursday fired its executive director after placing her on leave without explanation in mid-January.

Sarah Nagy had held the dual role of executive director and general counsel for 14 years at the agency, which regulates lobbying and interprets legislation affecting lobbyists.

Nagy told IBJ in January she was hospitalized for lupus-related complications and had submitted paperwork for a partial medical leave, but she said her leave status was not voluntary.

Nagy on Friday referred questions to local employment-law attorney Kevin Betz, who could not be immediately reached. Indiana Lobby Registration Commission Chairwoman Sue Scholer did not return a phone message.

The commission sidelined Nagy in January after a trying period in which she and lobbyists struggled to interpret the ethics law passed in 2010 ahead of the General Assembly's current session.

The law lowered the threshold at which lobbyists must report their spending, from $100 to $50, and banned them from taking leglislators on out-of-state junkets.

Other aspects of the law were confusing, Nagy said in January, and the commission needed to offer its interpretation before she could generate new forms and explain to lobbyists how to report their activity. One lobbyist, who declined to be named, agreed that the new rules were confusing but said the lack of guidance from Nagy was frustrating.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT