IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEW: Getting it just right isn't easy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

Kyle Ragsdale is one of Indy’s most noted contemporary artists. And his new work on display through Nov. 26 at the Harrison Center is as strong as anything I’ve seen him do. There’s just a lot of it.

The first painting you see on entering the building is “Texts Swirling in the Evening Air,” in which a playful cloud of apostrophes and other symbols hover over one of Ragsdale’s signature profiled people. Its impact is watered down, though, by the myriad of similar pieces that fill one of the three Harrison spaces devoted to his work. Rather than have a cumulative impact, the abundance of work leaves the impression that Ragsdale just cranks these out.
 

Painting by Kyle Ragsdale on display at the Harrison Center.
Painting by Kyle Ragsdale on display at the Harrison Center. Punctuation symbols swirl through recent work by Kyle Ragsdale, on display this month at the Harrison Center for the Arts. (Photos courtesy Harrison Center for the Arts)

And that’s just one of three spaces.

A second—really the hallways behind the main galleries—is the most densely packed, with repeated images of his shadowy signature period figures—top-hatted and ball-gowned. In some, such as “Tiepolo Stroll,” they promenade. In others, including “Field Dance,” and “Formal Dance,” they elegantly pair off, seeming to fade deeper into memory as they dance. But, again, the quantity diminishes the impact.

Of course, if more art on display equals more sales, I’m all for the overload. Esthetically, though, it was too much of a very good thing.

There’s more variety in the main gallery, which is devoted to work created for a booklet called “Share, Half-share,” published by the Indiana Humanities Council as part of its Food for Thought program (think mini-literary and art magazine/exhibit catalog/brochure). In it—and on the walls—Ragsdale’s work is partnered with close-up vegetative photography by Paul Baumgarten and text by John Beeler, Cindy Ragsdale and Tyler Henderson. All deal with Indiana’s relationship to food. The text is a little much for on-wall reading, but Ragsdale’s work here has a different kind of warmth than seen elsewhere, particularly in the gracefully shy persimmon-picking “Josie” and the glowing “Family Dinner.”
____________

Proportion is an issue, too, at the Arts Council of Indianapolis’ new Gallery 924, which currently is presenting

the IDADA Members Exhibition. The juried show—featuring work from those involved in the Indiana Downtown Artists and Dealers Association—is slight, with just 13 pieces featured.

Color is as important as content in Mary Lou Dooley Waller’s oddly soothing “Variations on a Swiss Army Knife” and in Carmen I. Hurt’s “Heatwave 2,” which offers a cityscape in sweltering oranges and yellows. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if these and most of the rest of the work in this show find buyers. A single juror, Zionsville-born Chicago arts educator Rowley Kennerk, did the selecting, and there’s little to take issue with. It just feels more like a visit to a well-appointed lobby than a complete gallery show.
____________

Visual art spaces aren’t the only places scale and length are relevant. Indiana Repertory Theatre recently opened production of Stephen Massicotte’s “Mary’s Wedding” (running through Dec. 4). It has the scale right—it’s an intimate, two-actors-and-a-cellist piece fitting nicely on the upperstage. It’s the theatrical equivalent of a short story, and a simple one at that: Immigrant girl meets lower-class stable boy (Mom doesn’t approve, of course). Girl and boy innocently fall for each other. Boy goes to war. Harlequin romances have been built on more complex premises.

Massicotte enriches the thin plot by weaving the woman’s memories of the boy and her letters from the front into a dream that takes her where she couldn’t have actually been … and brings him back into places he never would see.

The delicacy—enhanced by the cellist perched high along the back of the stage—works up to a point. But the narrative offers few surprises, the characters reveal little that isn’t seen in the first few minutes and, ultimately, what could have been a jewel-box of a show at under an hour feels stretched and repetitive. I admired its restraint and clarity, but afterward I found myself yearning for the resonance or emotional pull of similarly scaled shows (“Talley’s Folly” by Lanford Wilson and Brian Friel’s “Lovers” come to mind) despite IRT’s well-designed, well-acted effort.
____________

Over at the Indiana History Center, Actors Theatre of Indiana (soon to be the professional theater in residence at the Center for the Performing Arts in Carmel) offered a developmental presentation of “Stardust Memories: The Life & Music of Hoagy Carmichael.”

In a curtain speech, company member Cynthia Collins made clear that the show is a work in progress and that, for some scenes, the actors would be holding script. The audience seemed comfortable with that, and soaked up a musically engaging evening of Hoagy’s greatest hits (including “Skylark,” “Old Buttermilk Sky,” and “Georgia on My Mind”).

In its mix of presentational songs, mild biographical drama, and on-stage projections of photos and videos, ATI seems to be positioning itself as the heir to the old version of American Cabaret Theatre—only without the pretense. The company is well on its way on the music side—a USO section in the middle of the second act, including a fun Jimmy Durante appearance, perked things up considerably. And playing with the relationship between Carmichael and his friend, cornet master Bix Beiderbecke (who died young) hints at a stronger show to come.

But as it stands, the first half was jarringly short at about a half hour, film clips ran too long, and there’s a lot of work to be done on the script. There’s enough here, though, to indicate that one of Indiana’s leading musical stars is an appropriate subject for one of Indiana’s most promising professional theater groups. It will be interesting to see how the show develops. Stay tuned.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com. Twitter: IBJArts and follow Lou Harry’s A&E blog at www.ibj.com/arts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT