MARCUS: 90 counties show income improvement

Morton Marcus
May 1, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis has released personal-income data for each county in the nation. The Indianapolis area did not fare well.

These data include earned income, interest, dividends, rent and transfers (Social Security and unemployment compensation). When divided by population, we get per-capita personal income. In recent years, local and state politicians have latched onto PCPI as a yardstick of economic performance and well-being.

Thus it was an outraged Alexander Hamilton (not the fellow on the $20 bill) who rang my doorbell. “My county is not first? How could that be? We are the elite of the state. We have wider streets so that more drivers can be first at traffic lights. We have the most growth, which shows how popular and virtuous we are.”

“Alex,” I said calmly. “It happens. PCPI in Boone County surpassed Hamilton County several years ago. You just weren’t watching.”

“But why? Why is Dan Boone’s county on top and not mine anymore?” he asked.

“Suburban pioneers,” I replied. “Wealthy people, often when their children have moved on, leave the urban core seeking space, fresh air, exclusivity and distance from newcomers, while maintaining close contact with the core.

“As Hamilton County grew, adding stores, jobs and traffic, people responded and your county began to lose some of its desirability. Then a few pioneers migrated west within the county. Later, pioneers were entering Boone County for the same reasons that gave rise to Hamilton’s growth in the past.

“Now who is moving into Hamilton County? People with children. Children don’t earn money. They wear and eat money. Even if newcomers earn as much as the settled population, those children will cause PCPI to grow slowly or even fall.”

“But now we’re second in the state,” Alex moaned. “We look better in gold than silver. And look at who’s just below us: Porter, Hancock, Dubois, Floyd and Warrick. Where are these places? For whom were they named? What do people do there?”

“I think,” I said, “the more interesting aspect of those PCPI figures is that the spread between the wealthiest and the poorest counties in the state has hardly changed in 20 years. Back in 1998, when Hamilton was No. 1, its PCPI was 2.35 times higher than bottom-dwelling Starke County. In 2008, No. 1 Boone was 2.26 times higher than last-place LaGrange County.”

“So what!” Alex said. “The rich stay rich and the poor stay poor. Tell me something I don’t know.”

“OK,” I said. “Only two Indiana counties had declines in PCPI between 2006 and 2008: LaGrange and Elkhart. The other 90 counties advanced (without allowing for inflation, which hardly mattered in this period). While PCPI for the nation increased 6.5 percent, Indiana’s rose only 5.2 percent (41st among the 50 states).

“Every county (except Shelby) in the Indianapolis metro area lagged the state in PCPI growth. So, too, did five other counties. But all is not as it may seem. Take your county, Hamilton … .”

“Yes? Something good?” he asked eagerly.

“Hamilton,” I fed him slowly, “led the state in population growth from 2006 to 2008 with a 7.3-percent increase. That depressed its growth in PCPI, despite seeing a 10.5-percent advance in personal income. Similar results can be found in all five of the state’s fastest-growing counties in population, all of which were in the Indianapolis area.”

“So who had strong growth in both income and population?” Alex asked.

“I thought you’d never ask,” I replied. “Jasper, Hamilton and Porter counties were the top three. But, as I said earlier, Hamilton’s population growth (first in the state) was so strong that it offset much of the gains in income (17th), leaving the county ranked 85th of 92 in PCPI growth.”

“Then,” Alex said, “if growth of PCPI is the target, the best thing is to raise income and decrease population.”

“Exactly,” I said. “Try suggesting that in public.”•


Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. OK Larry, let's sign Lance, shore up the PG and let's get to the finals.

  2. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  3. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  4. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  5. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!