IBJOpinion

MARCUS: The nightmare in my neighborhood

Morton Marcus
March 5, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Morton Marcus

As I relaxed in my recliner, I pondered the surprise of February: the discovery of the most privileged elite in the United States—state and local government employees. Governors of Indiana and Wisconsin bravely revealed the evil perpetrated by this enormous cell of fiscal terrorists.

In case you missed it, many state and local government employees are unionized. It appears that unions force Americans to become arbitrary and authoritarian. People working in large organizations, banding together to negotiate the conditions under which they labor, destroy the harmony of the universe.

Now the virtuous, pressed into action by the realities of economic conditions, fight back. In response, grubby workers leave their posts as teachers, firefighters, health inspectors, geologists, medical workers and public safety officers to protest against noble efforts to reduce their influence, their pay and their dedication to public service.

A look at the facts will put this gallant charge into perspective. State and local government employees constitute 10.8 percent of all employed people in the nation. However, they receive 12.1 percent of the compensation, excluding capital gains. This gross imbalance also distorts the Indiana economy (10.7 and 11.5 percent, respectively) and is worse in Wisconsin (10.6 percent and 12.4 percent). 

Clearly, any group of workers with incomes in excess of their proportion in the economy are villains. The brave governors of Indiana and Wisconsin crusade for a world where all workers are paid the same (communism) or seek a world where the private sector dominates (fascism). I won’t believe this, but the evidence is before my eyes.

In Indiana, private-sector workers averaged $43,166 in salary in 2008 (the latest year for which data are available). State workers did better, at $45,930, and local government workers averaged an embarrassing $48,046. Why should we pay teachers with master’s degrees more than the sweating toilers flipping burgers?

Destruction of unions has been sought for decades by far-seeing Americans. Our nation strayed in 1935 when the federal Wagner Act allowed workers to join unions, which negotiate working rules as well as pay rates. Now, 76 years later, courageous leaders are mounting the long-awaited attack. Public-sector workers are too strong for the public good.

Yes, we want strong schools, buy why must we pay so much for them? Where is the spirit of public service? Yes, we want good police and fire services, but paying men and women above-average wages and pensions to perform difficult and dangerous jobs goes too far. Yes, we want good public hospitals, but do we need to pay taxes to support them? In fact, why can’t all public services be on a for-fee basis?

That’s the trouble with public services—they are provided free or at a small cost to the users, while the taxpayers get the bill. In this brave new world, let’s reduce taxes and use the model of our efficient and effective private sector: Charge user fees.

Education is the leading example. Let the families of students pay for schooling. Naturally, the poor will not be able to afford the services available to the rich, but if the poor really value education, they will find the money. Public hospitals should be the same. It is most evident that the rich and the poor are different. The rich are rich because they produce value for society while the poor, well, you know all about the poor—sloth.

When we treat all people alike, we defile and discourage our virtuous citizens. What reason does a person have to work if he can’t get a kidney faster than a social parasite? Hasn’t the time arrived to disband the stultifying superstructure of … ?

Do I hear a crying baby? No, it’s the cat on my lap. I’ve fallen asleep and had another of those right-wing nightmares.•

__________

Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

  2. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

    My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

  3. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

    Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

  4. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

    My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

    It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

    Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

    The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

  5. I think a lof people forget about the pressure put on the face of an organization. They also don't see them staying in their office until midnight, missing thier childrens baseball games and not being able to sleep b/c of the stress. We live in the land of opportunity, everyone has a chance to get that money

ADVERTISEMENT