IBJOpinion

MARCUS: The nightmare in my neighborhood

Morton Marcus
March 5, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

As I relaxed in my recliner, I pondered the surprise of February: the discovery of the most privileged elite in the United States—state and local government employees. Governors of Indiana and Wisconsin bravely revealed the evil perpetrated by this enormous cell of fiscal terrorists.

In case you missed it, many state and local government employees are unionized. It appears that unions force Americans to become arbitrary and authoritarian. People working in large organizations, banding together to negotiate the conditions under which they labor, destroy the harmony of the universe.

Now the virtuous, pressed into action by the realities of economic conditions, fight back. In response, grubby workers leave their posts as teachers, firefighters, health inspectors, geologists, medical workers and public safety officers to protest against noble efforts to reduce their influence, their pay and their dedication to public service.

A look at the facts will put this gallant charge into perspective. State and local government employees constitute 10.8 percent of all employed people in the nation. However, they receive 12.1 percent of the compensation, excluding capital gains. This gross imbalance also distorts the Indiana economy (10.7 and 11.5 percent, respectively) and is worse in Wisconsin (10.6 percent and 12.4 percent). 

Clearly, any group of workers with incomes in excess of their proportion in the economy are villains. The brave governors of Indiana and Wisconsin crusade for a world where all workers are paid the same (communism) or seek a world where the private sector dominates (fascism). I won’t believe this, but the evidence is before my eyes.

In Indiana, private-sector workers averaged $43,166 in salary in 2008 (the latest year for which data are available). State workers did better, at $45,930, and local government workers averaged an embarrassing $48,046. Why should we pay teachers with master’s degrees more than the sweating toilers flipping burgers?

Destruction of unions has been sought for decades by far-seeing Americans. Our nation strayed in 1935 when the federal Wagner Act allowed workers to join unions, which negotiate working rules as well as pay rates. Now, 76 years later, courageous leaders are mounting the long-awaited attack. Public-sector workers are too strong for the public good.

Yes, we want strong schools, buy why must we pay so much for them? Where is the spirit of public service? Yes, we want good police and fire services, but paying men and women above-average wages and pensions to perform difficult and dangerous jobs goes too far. Yes, we want good public hospitals, but do we need to pay taxes to support them? In fact, why can’t all public services be on a for-fee basis?

That’s the trouble with public services—they are provided free or at a small cost to the users, while the taxpayers get the bill. In this brave new world, let’s reduce taxes and use the model of our efficient and effective private sector: Charge user fees.

Education is the leading example. Let the families of students pay for schooling. Naturally, the poor will not be able to afford the services available to the rich, but if the poor really value education, they will find the money. Public hospitals should be the same. It is most evident that the rich and the poor are different. The rich are rich because they produce value for society while the poor, well, you know all about the poor—sloth.

When we treat all people alike, we defile and discourage our virtuous citizens. What reason does a person have to work if he can’t get a kidney faster than a social parasite? Hasn’t the time arrived to disband the stultifying superstructure of … ?

Do I hear a crying baby? No, it’s the cat on my lap. I’ve fallen asleep and had another of those right-wing nightmares.•

__________

Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT