Mass-transit supporters hopeful for compromise

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Supporters of competing plans to expand mass transit in central Indiana say they’ve got differences to work out before the General Assembly wraps up March 14 but they’re confident they can find resolution.

The House and Senate have passed similar versions of legislation to allow five counties to raise individual income taxes – with voter approval – to fund more buses and routes.

The bill is headed to a conference committee where two members of the House and two from the Senate will try to work out a compromise.

“My ultimate goal is to see high-quality transportation in metropolitan areas, particularly Indianapolis,” said Sen. Pat Miller, R-Indianapolis, the author of Senate Bill 176. “I want to make sure there is readily available, easy bus transportation, and all mass transit is readily available.”

As passed by the Senate, the bill would also have authorized a corporate income tax increase that would fund about 10 percent of the total cost of expanded mass transit. That version of the bill also banned local governments from using the increased revenue to fund light rail.

In the House, lawmakers dropped the ban on light rail and stripped out the corporate income tax increase.

Miller said the conference committee discussion will focus on the light-rail ban and proposals to exclude rural townships from paying taxes for the project.

Miller says she can’t predict an outcome until the bill’s legislation is finalized. But the bill’s House sponsor, Rep. Jerry Torr, R-Carmel, expects the bill to pass.

“We had a fairly close vote in the House, but I think some of the things we’re talking about doing may help pick up one or two votes.” Torr said. “I suspect we’ll have an agreement on whatever the conference report will come up with.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ