IBJNews

  • Home

Meridian latest brokerage to make affiliation move

Cory Schouten
August 1, 2011
Keywords
Brokers, Commercial Real Estate, Real Estate & Retail
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis commercial real estate brokerage Meridian Real Estate is picking up the NAI Global affiliation previously held by Olympia Partners, which folded in January after a 20-year run.

Meridian is the city's 15th-largest commercial brokerage, according to IBJ research. The Indianapolis-based firm with eight employees specializes in office, industrial and land brokerage and consulting. It will now operate as NAI Meridian.

NAI, which is based in Princeton, N.J., operates a network with more than 5,000 brokers in 55 countries.

The change is a continuation of an ongoing shakeup among the city’s largest commercial real estate brokerages. A string of name changes and broker moves has proven confusing even to industry veterans.

Among the biggest name changes: Colliers Turley Martin Tucker became Cassidy Turley, dropping the locally bankable Tucker name. Resource Commercial Real Estate grabbed the international Colliers affiliation and changed its name to match.

Grubb & Ellis Harding Dahm & Co. dropped the Grubb affiliation in favor of Lee & Associates. And locally based Halakar Real Estate agreed to partner with a New York real estate network and change its name to Newmark Knight Frank Halakar.

The former president of NAI Olympia Partners and two of its brokers joined Alliance Commercial Real Estate—which a veteran of Grubb & Ellis Harding Dahm & Co. (now Lee & Associates) launched in 2010. Olympia shut down for good in January.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT