IBJNews

Danica Patrick's NASCAR move could fuel MainGate growth

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Indy Racing League driver Danica Patrick’s move to NASCAR could pay off for Indianapolis-based MainGate Inc.

On Dec. 8, Patrick announced she will drive a limited number of races in the NASCAR Nationwide Series. Her first race will be Feb. 6.

MainGate holds an exclusive license to make and sell Patrick’s IRL-centric merchandise, and is now in negotiations with New York-based IMG, which represents Patrick, to get part of her NASCAR-related business.

Sports business experts think Danica Patrick’s crossover to NASCAR could boost the IRL. (IBJ File Photo)

Patrick’s main representative at IMG, Alan Zucker, also represents Peyton and Eli Manning.

MainGate President Dave Moroknek thinks Patrick’s NASCAR merchandise sales could easily match her IRL merchandise sales. While sports marketers estimate racing fans buy $6 million to $10 million worth of Patrick’s IRL merchandise each year, Moroknek would say only that Patrick sells more merchandise than all other IRL drivers combined.

If Patrick becomes a big NASCAR star, her stock-car merchandise will likely dwarf anything she made in the IRL. Top NASCAR stars such as Jeff Gordon and Dale Earnhardt Jr. sell about $30 million each in NASCAR-related merchandise annually, according to sports marketers.

“From every indication, the sale of Danica goods when she signs with NASCAR is going to be absolutely huge,” Moroknek said.

And Moroknek thinks the crossover will be good for the IRL as well.

“She has a real shot at being the first successful female driver in NASCAR history,” Moroknek said. “And if that happens, watch out. I think you’ll find people that follow Danica, will follow her in all the series she participates in.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT