IBJNews

Paving signals progress as I-69 creeps north

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Parallel concrete strips stretched to the horizon in front and behind, recently laid by a "paving train," the huge pieces of linked equipment that continuously pour, settle and smooth a two-lane strip of roadway at a time.

Workers in hard hats and yellow safety vests, construction equipment, trucks, and sundry other evidence of a work in progress dotted the landscape.

This was Interstate 69 in Daviess County, where much of the task of building the highway many thought they'd never see is close to wrapping up — at least for the stretch from Evansville northeast to Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center.

Indiana Department of Transportation project manager Brian Malone, an engineer whose assignments have included several of the bridges and overpasses along the route, told The Herald-Times last week that about 13 days of paving remained before both northbound and southbound lanes are finished from Evansville to the I-69/U.S. 231 interchange in southern Greene County, just west of Crane.

The big machines can lay between 2,000 and 3,000 feet of concrete in a 10-hour day, with the length varying by the distance between the site and the concrete mix plant that fills the stream of dump trucks supplying the train.

Malone was one of several transportation department officials and I-69 supporters who led an I-69 press tour to perhaps 15 miles south of the still-under-construction interchange into Daviess County, showing off the job and providing their perspective on the work.

The two-vehicle caravan, a 15-passenger van and an SUV, slowed where work was under way and where gaps in the paving required caution, switching lane directions depending on which side was more finished.

Approaches to most bridges were still unfinished. The machines that lay the concrete can't do that work, and such short stretches must be hand poured.

This summer's drought, which has withered so much of the corn standing stunted in adjacent farm fields, has been good for the project and for its contractors, said Cher Elliot, spokeswoman for the transportation department's Vincennes district, in which this stretch of the interstate lies.

The extended lack of rain meant there were no wet weather delays to slow things down, she said. "It's allowed the contractors up and down the corridor to work each and every day. ... We were probably the only industry to capitalize on the drought."

Will Wingfield, the department's director of media relations, added that another irony has been that the recession also has helped the project.

With so many companies looking for work, competition to win a slice of the job has been stiff. "We've seen bids come in roughly 22 percent below estimates," he said.

The first three sections of the project — 65 miles from Evansville to the U.S. 231 interchange — will cost about $600 million, he said.

The fourth section, 27 miles of roadway from the U.S. 231 interchange to Ind. 37 just south of Bloomington, is expected to cost about $600 million, the differential largely explained by differences in land and geology, as the route goes from relatively flat, easy-to-build-on terrain to hilly, karst areas that are more challenging in Greene and Monroe counties.

Three of six contracts for the Section 4 portion of the road have been let, and the final three are expected to be awarded by the end of the year.

The entire highway from Evansville to its intersection with Ind. 37 north of Victor Pike near Bloomington is expected to open to traffic by the end of 2014, Wingfield said.

Preliminary planning for Section 5, which will follow 37 through Bloomington to just south of Martinsville, is proceeding, with the draft environmental impact statement for that section due by the end of the year, state officials said.

Elliot said the state will continue its research and have public hearings on the draft statement for incorporation into the final environmental impact statement, which should go to the Federal Highway Administration by the end of the second quarter of 2013.

The federal agency would then issue a Record of Decision for Section 5, required before any detailed design work can begin.

Elliot said the state must show how the work will be paid for, something critics have said will prove very difficult, before the federal government issues its Record of Decision.

But if all goes according to plan, Elliot said, initial contracts for work on Section 5 could be awarded by the end of next year.

The first contracts would target parts of the plan that would ease traffic conditions made worse along Ind. 37 by the influx of additional traffic from I-69 after it connects with Ind. 37.

"Everybody seems very positive that everything will continue and make it through on these time lines," Elliot said. "We continue to move forward with the Section 5 process."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • no waste
    Have you ever had to drive to evansville or Memphis. Etc.. South. Or coming from Evansville to Indy??? The highway is long over due. Yes it might be expensive but!!! So is everything else.
  • Waste
    $600 Million here, $600 Million there.....pretty soon we are talking about real money.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT