IBJNews

Pence moves outside Indy to find tax cut support

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence is taking his pitch for a 10-percent cut in the personal income tax around the state after failing to lock down support for his signature legislative priority inside the Statehouse.

Pence has spent more time on the road in his first two months in office than at the Statehouse, delivering a plea to voters and Republican activists at their annual fundraisers: Lobby your representatives and senators for your cut.

Meanwhile, his aides, led by former campaign field organizer Chris Crabtree, have started an online campaign to pressure wavering lawmakers. Working with them are Indiana tea partyers, led by the Indiana branch of Americans for Prosperity, which has bought radio ads and is coordinating its own online campaign.

"We are determined to continue to reach out to members of the state Legislature and to the people they serve in the four corners of this state with a message that Indiana is in a unique position where we have the ability to fund our priorities and reduce taxes for every Hoosier," Pence said shortly before taking the stage at the Hamilton County Republican Party's annual Lincoln Day Dinner earlier this month.

The cut is critically important to Pence, both because he made it the centerpiece of his campaign for governor and also because it could give him a strong piece of legislation to run on should he pursue a 2016 White House bid.

The freshman Republican governor has stuck tightly to a script that calls the tax cut the best job-creator and economic development tool available to the state. More recently, he's amended that pitch to include stories of other states where Republican governors are looking to cut their state's income taxes.

During a recent swing through South Bend, Pence found broad support for the cut at the Chicory Cafe.

Philip Schreiber, owner of the Chicory Cafe, said he favors Pence's plan because he believes it will help the economy. "Put the money into the pockets of the people who earned it. When you earn it, you'll spend it wisely," he said.

Pence's latest campaign comes just months after he narrowly won the governor's office, collecting $14 million for a barrage of gauzy campaign ads. This campaign is more subtle, focusing squarely on the state's broad base of Republican activists. Pence estimates that before lawmakers leave the Statehouse at the end of April, he'll have headlined at least 15 Lincoln Day Dinners with his call for the tax cut.

The clearest example that the strategy might be penetrating the Statehouse walls came in a letter House Speaker Brian Bosma wrote to local Republican Party leaders explaining his decision to swap the tax cut for more spending on roads and schools.

But there are some critical signs that Pence's team has forgone the basics of working lawmakers in favor of thinking outside the granite and marble box. When the Senate Tax and Fiscal Policy vetted his tax cut earlier this month, the lead Senate sponsor spoke in favor of the cut, as did other supporters. But Pence didn't send anyone to testify for the measure.

That may be because inside the Statehouse, Pence faces a distinct challenge from local leaders plugged in through longstanding relationships with their state representatives and senators.

The Association of Indiana Counties held a conference across the street from the Statehouse a little more than a week ago, with hundreds of county officials pressing state lawmakers to keep money for roads in the state's $30 billion budget. Many had seen county roads and bridges suffer as former Gov. Mitch Daniels built $2 billion cash reserves.

That pitch resonated in the budget House Republicans drafted that removed Pence's tax cut and replaced it, in part, with $500 million for local roads.

But Pence is getting some ground support of his own.

"The word is getting out there. My fear is we're going to lose this supermajority (in the House) if they don't listen to the people and start being fiscally conservative like they campaigned so hard for," said Monica Boyer, an Indiana tea party leader who helped oust former U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar and who has re-focused her attention on the Statehouse.

Boyer started a Facebook group, "Kitchen Table Activism," that debates issues like the tax cut and a state financing plan for the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. The next step, she said, will be pressing lawmakers on the tax cut and other issues this weekend during town hall meetings, not unlike how tea partyers stormed Congressional town halls in the summer of 2009.

"I think it's accountability. I think for so long we focused on national politics, and now we're bringing it home," Boyer said.

Bosma and other top House Republicans insist Pence's tax cut could make it back into the budget before lawmakers leave at the end of April. But the action, for now, moves to the Senate.

Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, said any answer on the tax cut will have to wait until the state gets new tax collection forecasts in April. He argued that Pence could still claim victory at the end of the session even if lawmakers reject the tax cut.

"It's important to focus on the fact a lot is getting done. The income tax cut is getting a lot of attention, because it's topical, but is not a reflection of the governor's success," Long said. "Whether this income tax happens or not, it will be a very successful session for the governor. That'll be the cherry on top for him."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • RE: Tea Party - AGAIN?
    Really!! Teachers? That's where you go with this discussion. I have a lot of friends that are teachers and my sister is an elementary teacher, and they seem to be doing fine. Not quite standing in bread lines as you make it out to be. Through the recession, I know many more private employees that suffered much greater than teachers. Now that's not to say teachers haven't experienced cutbacks. They have. But they haven't been ravaged like you make it out to be. During a recession, adjustments in pay scale and benefits happen. Fact of life. Public emloyees shouldn't be immune to that. And regarding funding our education system, why is the answer always more money? We've continually increased funding education over the last few decades. And what do we have to show for it? Where are the results to support the additional funding?
  • Tea Party - AGAIN?
    Come on, Mike. This Tea Party influence is really not going to sell to the thinking voter. Asking for tax cuts in a time when 100's of teachers in indiana are being forced back to beginners wages and are making less than your average bus-boy just does not make sense. Wise up ! Why not use this "surplus" and help our educators? Name one thing that you have done recently to help a teacher. Nope, you would rather bully your elected State Superintendent publicly even though she was elected because of the failed policies of your buddy, Mitch!
    • Pence Will Bankrupt Hoosiers!!
      Pence is a joke. Dems hate him and smart Republicans didn't want him either. Sorry to see he has not left his Tea Party ways. The last thing we need is a tax cut with Daniels set up a brilliant scheme that repays parts of a surplus to citizens, while keeping current rates. We can invest in the future (essential given population shifts to the Sunbelt), while also being fiscally sound. With Pence's plan, he will mortgage the future and we won't have any more assets to sell off (ala Daniels) to get back out of it. Hoosiers should be afraid of Pence's proposal: the slightest national recession, and this state will be devastated!! Let's hope Bosma keeps him in line until the Republicans can find a better gubernatorial alternative.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT