IBJOpinion

FELDMANN: Put customer interest before revenue

Derrick Feldmann
November 21, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

6 a.m.: I turn on the TV and check for recorded shows from last night. I almost buy an entire season of “Law & Order” after an offer pops up on the screen.

7 a.m.: As I sync my iPod for the drive into work, I notice the Apple “Genius” recommendations. Genius, indeed: I buy two albums—and like them.

8 a.m.: I go to Staples to pick up office supplies. I use coupons I received as a “Staples Rewards” member. It just so happens the coupons are for the items I need.

10 a.m.: I head to Starbucks to get a free drink for my birthday. That’s right: If you go to the Starbucks site and register your gift card, you get a free coffee.

11 a.m.: Back at the office, I’m making flight arrangements for a client visit in Chicago. I search for the dates and flight times, but the options I find are a little pricey, so I call it quits. But wait! Later I get an e-mail from Orbitz—the price for the flights I was considering just went down. I book my flight.

noon to 5 p.m.: I have a client meeting. (I do more than shop.)

6 p.m.: At home after work, I find my wife on a Web site of a favorite retailer. “Guess what?” she says. “You get 20 percent off if you fill out a survey—that’s like free money.” I agree.

What a day. I’m exhausted from all the deals I’ve received. Of course, none of those deals were accidents, nor were the buying decisions they prompted. They were the result of information that companies collected about me and the way they put that information to work. They tailored content for me and made it easy for me to buy.

Certainly, the first part of that equation—understanding the customer and his or her motivation—is priceless, but it’s old-school and just half of the solution. The other half, the half that has really come of age recently, is making it easy for the customer to engage. And that’s what sets growing organizations apart from stagnant ones.

But, wait, you say: Not all of us have the high-tech weaponry those companies used. That’s OK. This engagement isn’t all about tools. It’s about an approach to customer/donor understanding that’s available to just about all of us if we’re willing to embrace it.

• Go beyond numbers. Create a profile of your customer, patron or donor that’s about more than demographics. Track people’s progress through your Web site and your locations. Track their decision-making process. Create a way to gather data that rewards those who participate.

• Meet people. Sometimes, we get so caught up in number-crunching that we fail to have actual conversations with prospects. Visit with them to understand how they make decisions.

• Be specific. The companies mentioned above did not say, “Come in and shop around.” They offered specific deals based on my interests. If you want engagement, be specific and make it easy. Use language that lets the customer or donor know exactly what you want him or her to do.

• Think action, not money. This is about engagement first and revenue second. As you send targeted messages, find opportunities for engagement; think about the companies above—they put customer interests first and the purchasing of a product second.

Every time you use your rewards card or customer-loyalty shopping pass, you’re helping a company meet your needs. How are you doing that for the people you serve?•

__________

Feldmann is CEO of Achieve, an Indianapolis consulting firm for not-for-profits. He can be reached at dfeldmann@achieveguidance.com.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT