IBJNews

Republic takes quarterly loss but beats analyst estimates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Republic Airways Holdings Inc. suffered a loss in its fourth quarter as its Frontier Airlines business continued to lose money and its contract business with other airlines remained slower than in 2009.

But the performance of the Indianapolis-based airline easily topped expectations of Wall Street analysts.

Republic lost $1.3 million, or 3 cents per share, in the three months ended Dec. 31, compared with a profit in the same quarter of 2009 of $20.1 million, or 55 cents per share, the company announced Tuesday evening.

However, Republic recorded several special charges in both quarters—including accounting charges in 2009 from its acquisition of Frontier and Midwest airlines, as well as expenses as it retires older planes and enters leases on new ones.

Excluding such charges, Republic would have earned $7.4 million in the fourth quarter, or 18 cents per share, a 252-percent increase from the same quarter the prior year.

On that basis, analysts expected Republic to earn profit of 6 cents to 9 cents per share, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

Republic revenue in the fourth quarter rose 2 percent, to $649.8 million. Analysts expected less than $642 million.

For all of 2010, Republic’s performance weakened. It suffered a loss of $13.8 million, compared with a 2009 profit of $39.7 million. Excluding special charges and gains, Republic recorded a 2010 profit of $32.3 million, or 90 cents per share, down from a $35 million gain, or 98 cents per share, the prior year.

Revenue for the year surged 61 percent over 2009—reflecting Republic's acquisitions—to $2.65 billion.

In November, Republic raised $88.5 million by selling 12 million extra shares of common stock, using the money to buy new aircraft and pay down its substantial debt. Since then, Republic’s shares have lost 30 percent of their value.

The shares closed Tuesday at $6.34 apiece—before Republic announced its earnings. The price fell another 3.5 percent Wednesday morning, to $6.11.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT