IBJNews

Roche wins approval of HPV test

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Roche Diagnostics Corp. won regulatory approval for a new HPV test, giving it a technological edge in the $300 million market for automated cervical cancer tests.

The Swiss giant, which runs its U.S. operations out of Indianapolis, will offer the HPV test as part of its cobas 4800 system of medical laboratory analyzers.

HPV, or human papillomavirus, is the leading cause of cervical cancer, which afflicts 12,000 new women every year in the United States, leading to 4,200 deaths annually, according to the National Cancer Institute.

Roche’s new product is the first, the company said, to test simultaneously for HPV 16 and 18, the two strains of the virus most likely to cause cervical cancer.

Roche’s HPV test is likely to compete with automated tests from Netherlands-based Qiagen NV and Massachusetts-based Hologic Inc., according to a report from MarketWatch, which estimated the automated HPV test market at $300 million in the United States. Automated tests are rarely used outside the United States, but Roche officials told MarketWatch they expect their test to gain traction.

The traditional smear tests for cervical cancer are still common around the world, but they require the analysis of doctors, which leads to errors. Roche’s clinical trials of its cobas HPV test found that one in 10 women received a false negative from smear tests. Roche's test confirmed that those women did, in fact, have cervical cancer.

“We look forward to working with laboratories and physicians to introduce the cobas HPV Test into routine cervical cancer screening,” Daniel O’Day, chief operating officer of Roche Diagnostics, said in a statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT