ROWLAND: Monument Circle is all about traffic

June 12, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eric RowlandI’ve always loved Monument Circle. It’s iconic. It’s magical in the wintertime and welcoming on warm summer days. But Monument Circle is not perfect.

Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard acknowledged that recently when he announced the city will close vehicular traffic around the circle in August to study whether a closure will increase visitors and affect businesses.

Time and again, communities have tried pedestrian plazas in downtown areas and have failed because, without cars, there are few people, and businesses failed. It’s happened in Evansville, Richmond and Muncie, and all over the country. Even Chicago reopened State Street to traffic after finding that reserving it for just pedestrians and buses was killing the legendary retail area.

Several years ago, I received a fellowship to study public plazas throughout Europe and North America. Among the many things I observed, two critical elements were evident in thriving public plazas:

• They have a strong focal point for identity and orientation, whether it was a historic cathedral in Rome, a simple fountain in a Parisian garden, or a statue in a park in New York City.

• There is an availability of critical mass of people, which can come from the sheer population of the city, residential density, or the accessibility of mass transit and vehicular traffic.

What few people realize is that the most successful public plazas allow vehicles either through the core or along the perimeter.

Yes, the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Monument is unique, but we’ve got to be honest. Only a fraction of people who go downtown actually go inside the monument. It’s simply not enough to draw masses of people to the Circle.

We must recognize that the monument is a 285-foot-tall obstacle that stands in the way of the Circle’s becoming a successful pedestrian-only plaza. The design of its fountains and steps makes pedestrian navigation challenging. Great plazas are successful—in part—because the cathedrals or gardens are in large, nearly level spaces where people can move freely about. On the Circle, the monument is like a permanent blind spot—you never can see to the other side and you can’t fully experience the space. The monument works great on a city-wide scale, but it’s overwhelming at the pedestrian scale.

What does work well about the monument—the large staircases—is successful in part due to the traffic. People sit and watch the activity around them, some of which is the cars. Vehicles provide a rapidly renewing source of entertainment.

The city of Indianapolis is planning public meetings and asking for input. It’s up to all of us to get involved, be heard and help determine what we really want Monument Circle to be.

While The Indianapolis Chapter of the American Institute of Architects opposes a permanent ban of vehicles on the Circle, we do have some ideas for consideration:

• Renovate the fountains. The walls around the fountain are too high and the water pools are too low. They need to be redesigned to create more interaction.

• Consider reducing traffic to one lane and adding dropoffs at key areas.

• Increase the number of scheduled events year-round, to give people more reasons to visit the Circle. I fondly remember ice skating on the Circle and wish I could share that experience with my kids.

• Improve public transportation to bring in more pedestrians.

Monument Circle is cherished in Indianapolis. We need to understand and appreciate what we do have, and improve on that.•


Rowland is a registered architect specializing in urban design at Rowland Design in Indianapolis and is a board member of the Indianapolis Chapter of the American Institute of Architects.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.