IBJNews

NFP of NOTE: School on Wheels Corp.

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Not-For-Profit of Note

School on Wheels Corp.
2815 E. 62nd St., Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46220
Phone: (317) 202-9100
Fax: (317) 205-9615
Web site: www.indyschoolonwheels.org
Founded: 2001
Paid employees: 15
Highest-paid staff member: Sally Bindley, founder and CEO, $47,500
Top volunteers: Michael Butler, three years, tutors weekly at Coburn Place; Harry Danz, four years, has tutored at Salvation Army Social Service Center and currently at Coburn Place

MISSION

School on Wheels provides a continuum of academic care for homeless children by tackling one of the leading causes of homelessness: lack of education.

MANAGEMENT

Sally Bindley, CEO
Janet Youngblood Hiatt, vice president of development
Melanie Priest, program director

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Jennifer Rhodes, chairwoman
Harry Danz, vice chairman and chairman-elect
Joanne McAnlis, secretary
Cindy Taylor, treasurer
Carole Casto
Pam Dechert
Helen Lewis
Megan Maurer
Brian Schmidt
Randy Zentz 
Bob Zier

PROGRAMS

Tutors in Action: Recruits volunteer tutors to help homeless children complete homework and promote positive study habits. Tutors in Action takes place at 11 homeless shelters in Indianapolis and one elementary school. In addition to daily tutoring, children receive free backpacks, school supplies and school uniforms.

Ignite Learning: Provides educational advocacy and support to homeless parents of the children tutored and creates educational opportunities for homeless students to gain access to high school mentoring and college scholarships. This program encourages parents to become informed and involved in their children's education and paves the way for homeless children to become college graduates.

FUND-RAISER

School on Wheels did not host its annual auction and benefit concert this year so that management could focus on programming and sustainability instead of event planning. As an alternative, School on Wheels conducted an online campaign called "The Race to End Homelessness." During the month of April 2009, board, staff and volunteers solicited donations and raised $32,258.

FINANCIAL PROFILE

2008 income: $491,841
2008 expenses: $459,341
2008 assets: $313,193
2009 projected income: $475,300
2009 projected expenses: $471,400
Fiscal year begins: July 1
___

Information was provided by School on Wheels. Profiled organizations must be based in or serve the Indianapolis area, must have Internal Revenue Service tax-exempt status, and must be willing to provide IBJ with detailed financial information.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT