State lawmakers to probe WellPoint premium hikes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana House Committee on Insurance will hold a hearing Wednesday morning to examine premium hikes by Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Indiana, a unit of WellPoint Inc.

Rep. Craig Fry, D-Mishawaka, plans to probe the Indianapolis-based health insurer’s premium increases on individual policies. Anthem policyholders in Indiana have reported increases of as much as 39 percent.

That's as high as WellPoint hiked premiums on individual policies in California, which sparked national outrage after President Barack Obama highlighted them during a national television interview on Feb. 7. WellPoint executives will appear in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 24 to answer the questions of a Congressional committee investigating the matter.

WellPoint will send three representatives to the Indiana Statehouse on Wednesday to answer questions about the premium increases: Rob Hillman, president of Anthem Indiana; John Willey, director of public affairs; and Jimmy Lee, vice president for WellPoint’s individual business.

The Indiana Department of Insurance, which approved Anthem’s premium increases after an outside actuary evaluated them, will also send an official to answer questions from the committee members, said John Schorg, spokesman for the Indiana House Democrats.

WellPoint’s premium increases are scheduled to take effect in Indiana on March 1. In California, WellPoint has delayed its rate increases by two months while state officials investigate.

WellPoint officials have said the poor economy caused many healthy people to drop coverage, driving up rates for those who remain insured.


  • well to the point
    When i ordered the " state of indiana " into the ethical state of confusion,my plan is to flush up the worst of the worst in our area.The code name for this operation is EPBYB. One B is now finished.Bayh, by! Four to go, then peice.Ethic officer I>C>.. Supreme commander distict 5 planet earth, {ola simme e-stat) BigD

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now