IBJNews

Tax caps lead to painful budget cuts in some counties

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana homeowners and businesses have seen their tax bills cut by more than $655 million since the General Assembly approved property tax caps in 2008. But the savings have come at the expense of local governments, which have been forced to cut millions and reduce services to compensate for the lost revenue.

Gov. Mitch Daniels says the caps make Indiana's property taxes some of the lowest in the nation. The caps limit property tax bills to 1 percent of a home's assessed values, with caps of 2 percent for farmland and rental property and 3 percent for business property. Lawmakers amended them into the state constitution in November in hopes of making them more difficult to undo.

Daniels told The Associated Press he sees a need for consolidation of "redundant" local units that are too small to operate efficiently.

"I think where there was overspending, (the tax caps are) bringing discipline," Daniels said. "In places where spending is more reasonable, there's still more opportunity for reform at the local level."

But for counties like Delaware, Madison, Marion and St. Joseph, the caps have instead brought about painful decisions about what government can pay for.

Marty Wolfson, professor and director of the Higgins Labor Study Program at the University of Notre Dame, said the law came at a time when the recession was depressing home values, which meant less tax revenue for local governments even before the tax caps took effect.

Unlike tax credits in other states, where homeowners who struggled to pay property taxes could be exempt, Indiana's caps missed the point because they benefit businesses at the expense of homeowners who have to pay the fee regardless, according to Wolfson.

"It's not the best policy to begin with. And it was made worse by the recession," Wolfson said. "There are these circuit-breaker laws in other states. And to my understanding, the other states that adopt circuit breakers tie this to the ability to pay the property tax liability."

Some worry the caps are beginning to erode local governments' core functions, especially public safety.

"There are some positive things in budget tightening and looking at what you really need and some things, but there comes a point when you're getting pretty close to cutting major services," said James Borgmann, director of Muncie Downtown Development Partnership. "I think what they're trying to figure out is 'Oh geez, where does it end?' They may get below basic services, the ability to cover basic services effectively."

Delaware County, which has the smallest population of the hardest-hit counties at 117,000 residents, recorded the highest per-capita loss, with a $25.4 million drop in revenue in 2010. That loss accounted for nearly 15 percent of the county's budget in 2010, according to an analysis prepared by the nonpartisan Legislative Services Agency.

St. Joseph County did without $35.6 million in 2010 because of the property tax caps. That's 12.4 percent of the county's budget. Marion County, the state's largest, saw $79.2 million in property tax credits, but that comprised only 7.3 percent of its budget.

In southern Indiana, Madison County lost more than $29 million. Vigo County saw the impact of the caps nearly triple between 2009 and 2010, leaving it to cover $15 million — or about 14 percent of its budget.

The Legislative Services Agency estimates Lake County would lose nearly $103 million in 2010, but the situation there is compounded by a state law freezing property tax revenue unless the county adopts a local income tax. Lake County is the only one of Indiana's 92 counties without such a tax. County officials said they would be forced to eliminate more than 100 jobs to close a $9 million shortfall in the county's 2011 budget because of the freeze and the property tax caps.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • There was plenty of time...
    Local governments had plenty of time to plan before tax cuts took affect, and even then they were phased in. However, those governments in both Madison and Delaware counties chose not to plan, just plow forward with budgets that could not be funded, and now they find themselves in the situation they're in. Had they started preparing for this five years ago, they'd likely have many fewer 'hard choices' to make today.

    Tax caps means more money in taxpayers pockets (or at least it should, had it not been for the push in fees and LOIT / COIT). Nontheless, most taxpayers, especially residential taxpayers, should be in as good as or better shape than they were before the caps.
  • Genious!
    good job mitch, you truly set us straight on this one. People are clearly pleased with the cost of things now that they have more money and our residential population is booming................what a moron, a plan of how to work on reduction would have been nice first. Guess u can add this to your campaign.
    • Geography nitpick
      Madison Co. is in central Indiana, just up I-69 from Indianapolis.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. "This was a very localized, Indiana issue," he said. As in, Indiana failed to expand Medicaid to cover its poor citizens resulting in the loss of essential medical services, including this EMS company. Well done, Indiana GOP. Here are the real death panels: GOP state governments who refuse to expand Medicaid for political reasons.

    2. In the "one for all, all for none" socialist doctrine the sick die...this plus obama"care" equates to caucasian genocide plus pushed flight to cities thus further eroding the conservative base and the continualed spiral toward complete liberal/progressive/marxist America.

    3. There is a simple reason why WISH is not reporting on this story. LIN has others stations in different markets that are affiliated with CBS. Reporting about CBS blindsiding WISH/LIN due to CBS's greed and bullying tatics would risk any future negoations LIN will have with CBS in other markets.

    4. My best always! Dave Wilson

    5. How did Columbus, Ohio pull off a car share service without a single dollar of public subsidies? They must not have a mayor who is on the take like Indianapolis. Daimler Benz offers Columbus residents their Smart Cars on a market-driven basis: "This has some neat features. Cars don’t have to be picked up and dropped off at fixed points. You find one with your smart phone based on GPS, and drop it off anywhere in the service area you can find a spot – even at a meter. These cars aren’t required to feed the meter so you get free on street parking while using them. I was told this system was put in place on a market basis without subsidies – and that the vendor actually pays the city for the use of the meters." http://www.urbanophile.com/2014/05/26/checking-in-on-columbus/

    ADVERTISEMENT