IBJNews

Visteon judge won't halt benefits termination

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Delaware bankruptcy judge on Tuesday refused to halt implementation of his order allowing auto parts supplier Visteon Corp. to terminate its retirees' health and life insurance benefits.

An attorney for a union representing some 2,100 people who worked at two Visteon plants in Indiana argued Tuesday that many are facing hardship, and that the order should be stayed pending an appeal to a federal district court judge.

"Literally, lives are in danger," said Susan Jennick, a lawyer representing retirees who worked at Visteon's shuttered plants in Connersville and Bedford.

Visteon, a top supplier to and a former subsidiary of Ford Motor Co., argued at a hearing last year that the retiree benefits were one of its largest liabilities and posed a significant obstacle to a successful reorganization. The company claimed that the retiree health and life insurance subsidies constituted a liability of about $310 million.

According to court records, benefits for retirees of the two Indiana plants alone cost the company more than $1 million a month.

But Vicki Jo Lady, a maintenance worker employed by Visteon for 33 years, said she and her husband both suffer from chronic illnesses and had to cut back on medication as they faced the loss of their employer-sponsored coverage. Lady, 58, began sobbing as she described the choice of paying for COBRA coverage and making house payments and buying groceries.

"They don't look at me as a person, they look at me as a piece of paper," she told Judge Christopher Sontchi before offering a tearful plea to Visteon officials.

"You're messing with people's lives here," she said. "... You're intelligent people; quit taking from people out of greed."

While acknowledging the decision to terminate benefits will cause hardship for some, Visteon attorney Steve McCormick said the appeal is bound to fail, and that further delays will only cause confusion for retirees exploring other health plans in advance of the April 1 benefits termination.

After a three-hour hearing, which included testimony from Connersville mayor Leonard Urban, Sontchi stood by his earlier ruling, in which he determined that the retirees did not have vested rights in the benefits and that Visteon had the ability to terminate them unilaterally.

"Needless to say, this is an extremely serious issue, the court is well cognizant of that," said a somber Sontchi. He agreed with Visteon that the retirees had not met the standards for him to halt implementation of his ruling, including the likelihood that their appeal would be successful.

"It would be further delay of the inevitable," said Sontchi, who also acknowledged the hardship some retirees will face.

In other developments, Visteon submitted a revised reorganization plan that provides more recovery for unsecured creditors than its original plan did.

Visteon attorney Marc Kieselstein said the company is receptive to bondholders who want to propose an alternative plan that would pay off the term loan lenders and leave the bondholders in control of the company, but that the bondholders have yet to submit a definitive proposal.

"We're waiting for a specific plan," he said.

Attorneys for the bondholders and other unsecured creditors accused the company of filing an amended plan in an effort to gain an advantage over the bondholders group, which says it needs time to complete its due diligence.

A hearing on the company's revised plan is set for April 13.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • what a crime
    How did the UAW let this happen, where were the big buck Union lawyers??? Visteon closed the North penn plant and is now building those parts elsewhere in Pa. after the UAW tricked them into another contract to close the plant. Sounds like the UAW was in on this miscarriage of justice from the beginning. What are they getting from it all to sell their retirees down the river. Let it be a lesson to all the UAW members out there..You can't trust your Union...Vote em all out and go with another Union thats smart enough to protect what you worked 30 years to get..Someone should hang by their balls for this

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

  2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

  3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

  4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

  5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?

ADVERTISEMENT