IBJNews

WRTV co-anchor spot up for grabs with Kooi departure

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The tumult of turnovers and retirements in the local TV news business this year continues right to the end of the calendar, as WRTV-TV Channel 6 news anchor Jenna Kooi hangs up the earpiece.

jenna kooi mugJenna Kooi

Kooi had been out on maternity leave over the last several weeks and has decided not to return, according to the station. She joined the ABC affiliate in early 2012 as co-anchor of the 7 p.m. and 11 p.m. newscasts with Todd Connor.

Previously, she had worked at WXIN-TV Channel 59, then as Jenna Maloney.

“We have not yet announced a replacement for Jenna,” said WRTV News Director Terri Cope-Walton.

Owned by E.W. Scripps Co., WRTV has bolstered its news programming this year. That included resuming weekend morning newscasts that had been cut years ago under previous owner McGraw-Hill.

WRTV lost one of its big guns this fall with the retirement of statehouse reporter Norm Cox. The bespectacled Cox spent 36 years at the station, covering seven governors.

Other changes in local TV news in recent months have included WTHR-TV Channel 13’s termination of weekend anchor and reporter Nicole Pence.  Sources said the departure was related to a report she was preparing about the unsolved Burger Chef murders.

Meanwhile, longtime local anchor Debby Knox retired last month after nearly four decades at WISH-TV Channel 8.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • A pay off here?
    Nicole Pence was maybe getting too close to the truth in those murders? Who paid whom off to stop her and the story?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT