Young & Laramore launches all-digital campaign for Scotts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In what’s equivalent to adding grubs to the once-lush lawn of traditional media, Indianapolis advertising agency Young & Laramore is launching an all-digital ad campaign for client Scotts LawnService.

The majority of Scotts' ads for this year’s lawn care season will be in the form of website banner ads, social promotions on Facebook and those short commercials that run ahead of videos on online sites like YouTube. They will focus on consumers talking about their neighbors' yards, applying a subtle form of peer pressure to check out Scotts' professional lawn care services.

“Usually, digital tended to be more of a support medium. This is different because it is the core of this campaign,” said Tom Denari, president of Young & Laramore.

In fact, only a few years ago, digital campaigns were the first to be cut from the media plan, said Paul Knapp, CEO of Y&L.

Denari declined to specify how much is being spent on the campaign, but Scotts is one of its top-three clients. Y&L landed the national ad account for Scotts in early 2011, handling radio, print, direct-mail and digital marketing for the firm.

Young & Laramore had annualized billings of $45 million in 2011, according to IBJ research.

Scotts LawnService, known for its trucks that arrive at customers' homes, isn’t slashing traditional media entirely this season. It will still use direct mail. And the Marysville, Ohio-based firm makes heavy use of television for its consumer-applied lawn products, such as fertilizer and grass seed. That advertising is separate from the Y&L account.

Scotts LawnService’s emphasis on digital marketing follows an overall industry trend. Shoe maker Nike slashed its television and print spending by about 40 percent from 2009 to 2011. In 2010, it spent almost $800 million on non-traditional media.

A survey of marketers by Duke University Fuqua School of Business found that business-to-consumer marketers plan to boost digital marketing by 14 percent in the year period ending next February.

At the same time, those marketers planned to trim traditional ad spend by nearly 1 percent.

“Traditional marketing ad spending has been on a decline over the last two years,” said Kim Saxton, a clinical professor of marketing at the Indiana University Kelley School of Business.

One issue with traditional media, particularly television, is that it has become fragmented, with an seemingly endless number of channels. Except for events such as the Super Bowl, “it’s harder to find a lot of eyes at once,” Saxton said.

Digital marketing is no nirvana, however, and it can be just as challenging to find the appropriate channels. “Everybody is trying to figure out how to provide relevant and engaging content where people are looking for information,” Saxton added.

For example, she said, the effectiveness of banner ads that appear on websites has come into question as they become ubiquitous. Denari acknowledges that they often get a “bad rap,” but said there is more agencies and marketers can do to develop “creatively compelling content.”

Y&L is looking to target particular websites in certain geographic markets for the digital content, he said.

“Breaking through on one of these underrated platforms holds great potential for using creativity to reach a targeted audience,” Denari said.

One way marketers are trying to make Web ads relevant is by the use of "remarketing"–harvesting the Internet addresses of those who visit their websites and then pushing out ads later to those visitors as they surf online.

Saxton cited a study that showed shoppers used online information in 65 percent of their buying decisions. That could pay off for Scotts—already a household name that doesn’t need to use its ad budget to introduce its brand.

In crafting the current digital campaign, Y&L found that consumers tend to view their own lawns through their neighbors’ eyes.

Denari said most people realize they’ll never have the best lawn in the neighborhood, but rather are motivated to improve theirs if only not to be seen as having the worst lawn on the block.

Young & Laramore is the city’s fourth largest full-service ad agency. Its other big clients include Schlage, Farm Bureau Insurance and Brizo.


  • No Surprise...And Nice To See.
    This makes perfect sense given that the heavy lifting for the Scott's brand has been done elsewhere and little else really needs to be done beyond driving..oh I don't know...how about some business. Nice work. From my perspective being in the business, it's nice to see our ad market getting a look from national advertisers like Scott's. We're a smart and innovative digital marketplace and there are enough of us old warhorses around the Indy market to actually bring some integrated marketing sensibilities to a space that can easily devolve into the wild wild West with regard to self indulgence, superficiality and esoterica. Let's bring more like this to Indy! The rising tide raises all shops. Nice work, Y & L!
  • No brainer
    It's really a no-brainer that Scotts is going all digital, they've been seeing a lot of success with ExactTarget.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.