IBJNews

2011 NEWSMAKER: Simon collects big raise, takes on Amazon.com

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Year In Review
More
Stories
State's economy stuck in neutral Indictment: Durham looted Fair Finance Ballard cruises to second term City backs string of high-profile
                              projects Manning's injury sends Colts
                              into tailspin Downtown mall stung by loss
                              of Nordstrom Right-to-work battle derails
                              legislative session General Assembly overhauls K-12 education Real estate meltdown leaves developers reeling Spate of Indiana firms
                              lines up for IPOs Rolls-Royce relocated 2,500
                              jobs to downtown Openings launch new era for
                              tourism biz Patent expirations up pressure
                              on Lilly Las Vegas crash saps IndyCar
                              momentum


Newsmakers
Simon
                              takes on Amazon.com Melangton Daniels White in crosshairs as reformers target IPS

Simon Property Group Inc. took a big step in 2011 to lock down its well-respected CEO, already the state’s highest-paid chief executive.

The company signed an employment agreement with CEO David Simon that will keep him as head of the Indianapolis-based company the next eight years.

The deal gives Simon, 49, a one-time award of 1 million long-term-incentive performance units—worth $120 million at the current share price—that begin vesting in six years as part of the agreement.

“David Simon is widely recognized as the leading CEO in our industry and one of the top executives in corporate America,” Simon Property said in an e-mailed statement. “The board believes it is in the best interest of SPG shareholders to secure Mr. Simon’s continued service as CEO for at least the next eight years through this equity-based retention plan with long-term vesting.”

Simon has been CEO of the real estate investment trust since 1995.

Simon Simon

He received a pay package of cash, stock and perks valued at $24.6 million for 2010. About $13.3 million came in the form of stock awards that will pay out only if Simon achieves certain targets in the future.

Shortly after landing his long-term deal, Simon aimed his famous ire at Amazon and its sales-tax advantage. The company filed suit against the Indiana Department of Revenue in an attempt to force the state to collect sales taxes from Amazon.com Inc.

The mall powerhouse said it filed the suit not to collect “monetary damages,” but to level the playing field for Indiana’s brick-and-mortar retailers, including the tenants at its 27 Indiana shopping centers.

David Simon has made no secret of his annoyance at the tax advantage Amazon enjoys, summing up his position at an address to the Economic Club of Indiana in 2010.

“[The] Internet has a distinct advantage, which in my opinion is unfair,” he said at the time. “And hopefully we’re looking for fairness in our tax system. If you sell it in the physical world versus the virtual world, it ought to be the same. We need to level the playing field tax-wise.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT