IBJNews

State's economy still stuck in neutral

IBJ Staff
December 24, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Year In Review
More
Stories
State's economy stuck
                              in neutral Indictment: Durham looted Fair Finance Ballard cruises to second term City backs string of high-profile projects Manning's injury sends Colts into tailspin Downtown mall stung by loss of Nordstrom Right-to-work battle derails legislative session General Assembly overhauls K-12 education Real estate meltdown leaves developers reeling Spate of Indiana firms lines up for IPOs Rolls-Royce relocated 2,500 jobs to downtown Openings launch new era for tourism biz Patent expirations up pressure on Lilly Las Vegas crash saps IndyCar momentum


Newsmakers
Simon
                              takes on Amazon.com Melangton Daniels White in crosshairs as reformers target IPS

Treading water. Spinning its wheels. Stuck in a rut.

There are many glib phrases for the economy in 2011, and they are all apt.

The year started with a sense that slowly—not fast enough for anyone’s liking—but steadily, Indiana’s economy was coming back. But then a spike in gas prices and the never-ending sovereign debt crisis in Europe created a summer of setbacks.

Employment in Indiana actually peaked in July 2010, on a seasonally adjusted basis, and has never quite reached that same level since. The state had 2.79 million workers in October 2011, the most recent data available. It had exactly the same number a year ago.

Average weekly wages for private workers trended down most of the year until spiking in October to a new high of $744.50. Could that augur better days to come?

Yes and no, says Ball State University economist Michael Hicks. Productivity gains have slowed way down, which suggests businesses will have to do more hiring if they want to keep expanding. But any improvements in overall economic vitality will be gradual, not dramatic.

“Unfortunately, I’m predicting next year as a redux of this year,” Hicks said.

Things are certainly brighter in Kokomo, where a resurgent Chrysler Group LLC is keeping its factories humming and even paying overtime to its 3,500 workers there.

Manufacturing in general has steadily improved this year. The sector still employs far fewer people than it did when the recession began in December 2007. But manufacturers added 6,000 jobs this year, and hours worked and wages paid were trending up in October.

Also, temporary hiring has been rising since the summer, which usually signals that companies are bringing on new workers, hoping to convert them to full-time hires later on.

But there could be shocks, particularly if heavily indebted Greece or, even worse, Italy, defaults on its bonds. That could create a European banking crisis that, if not disastrous for the United States, certainly wouldn’t be helpful.

In the Indianapolis area, the number of jobs grew during the first quarter, then plunged, hitting lows not seen since 2003. In October, the metro area had 865,500 workers—about 3,700 fewer than it had at the end of 2010.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT