IBJNews

City backs string of high-profile real estate projects

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Year In Review
More
Stories
State's economy stuck
                              in neutral Indictment: Durham looted Fair Finance Ballard cruises to second term City backs string of high-profile projects Manning's injury sends Colts into tailspin Downtown mall stung by loss of Nordstrom Right-to-work battle derails legislative session General Assembly overhauls K-12 education Real estate meltdown leaves developers reeling Spate of Indiana firms lines up for IPOs Rolls-Royce relocated 2,500 jobs to downtown Openings launch new era for tourism biz Patent expirations up pressure on Lilly Las Vegas crash saps IndyCar momentum


Newsmakers
Simon
                              takes on Amazon.com Melangton Daniels White in crosshairs as reformers target IPS

The administration of Mayor Greg Ballard found its stride in the final year of its first four-year term, at least when it comes to major publicly supported real estate projects.

The largest by far was CityWay, a $156 million mixed-use development now under construction at Delaware and South streets.

The complex, to be built primarily on Eli Lilly and Co.-owned parking lots, calls for a boutique 157-room Dolce hotel, a YMCA branch, 320 apartments and 40,000 square feet of retail and office space, all developed by locally based Buckingham Cos.

Taxpayers are acting as the project’s bank, putting up nearly every dollar used to build it, chiefly by loaning $86 million raised from the sale of municipal bonds.

As IBJ reported in April, taxpayers are shouldering most of the risk in the no-bid deal, while the potential for a tangible profit rests squarely in private hands.

Buckingham stands to cash in every step of the way, earning fees for all three of its divisions—development, construction and property management. And Lilly gains a new amenity for its corporate campus while cashing out of a 20-year-old arrangement with the city that required the company to make periodic payments on infrastructure bonds.

Elsewhere in Indianapolis, the city agreed to kick in $6.3 million toward a new parking garage in Broad Ripple that also will feature first-level retail. The project would replace a long-vacant service station and help alleviate a parking crunch in the area.

But critics of the $15 million project, including members of the Broad Ripple Village Association, question the new retail space and the rationale behind such a rich city subsidy.

City officials refused to share financial projections for the construction and operation of the 350-space parking garage, describing the documents—which developer Keystone Construction filed as part of its bid—as a “trade secret” exempt from public disclosure.

In a 2007 study, Walker Parking had reported the selected site would be inappropriate for a parking garage and that such a structure should cost about $15,000 per space. The $6.35 million subsidy for Keystone works out to more than $18,000 per space.

Construction has begun on a project to convert the former Bush Stadium into 268 apartment units, whose rents will range from $480 to $1,400 per month. The stadium’s façade will be preserved.

The $23 million project, led by developer John Watson, is set to get a $5 million infusion from the city.

Finally, the city sought bids for the redevelopment of a 1.45-acre property at Massachusetts Avenue and New Jersey Street occupied by the Indianapolis Fire Department. The city had not yet picked from among five bidders. The project is expected to cost $30 million to $50 million.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT