IBJNews

Political neophyte Ballard cruises to second term

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Year In Review
More
Stories
State's economy stuck
                              in neutral Indictment: Durham looted Fair Finance Ballard cruises to second term City backs string of high-profile projects Manning's injury sends Colts into tailspin Downtown mall stung by loss of Nordstrom Right-to-work battle derails legislative session General Assembly overhauls K-12 education Real estate meltdown leaves developers reeling Spate of Indiana firms lines up for IPOs Rolls-Royce relocated 2,500 jobs to downtown Openings launch new era for tourism biz Patent expirations up pressure on Lilly Las Vegas crash saps IndyCar momentum


Newsmakers
Simon
                              takes on Amazon.com Melangton Daniels White in crosshairs as reformers target IPS

A contentious battle for Indianapolis mayor culminated in a second term for Republican Mayor Greg Ballard, who won the race with 51 percent of the vote. His Democratic challenger, Melina Kennedy, garnered 47 percent.

Ballard, who won his first political victory in a huge 2007 upset against two-term incumbent Bart Peterson, maintained his appeal as a political outsider and moderate Republican, which helped him in an election that otherwise brought strong Democratic victories.

Democrats swept control of the City-County Council, winning all four at-large seats and capturing seats in tossup districts such as the Beech Grove area to gain a 16-13 edge.

 During the race, Ballard touted his administration’s fiscal restraint; initiation of public-safety reforms; and spending to repair roads, bridges and other infrastructure as selling points for his re-election. Ballard’s first term included sizable initiatives such as the sale of the city’s water and sewer utilities, the long-term lease of Indianapolis’ parking meters and plans for a large development on the south side of downtown near Eli Lilly’s campus.

Kennedy, a former deputy mayor under Peterson, made K-12 education the centerpiece of her campaign, pledging to make it a top priority if elected. She also rolled out plans to spend proceeds from the utilities sale on early childhood education, crime prevention and job training, and attacked Ballard’s record on issues such as public safety and economic development.

Observers said Kennedy’s negative approach—and potentially her gender—hurt her in the race.

In his next term, Ballard is expected to focus on initiatives to rejuvenate the urban areas just outside downtown to the borders of Interstate 465. Community leaders have promoted ideas for improving mass transit and channeling utilities sale money toward neighborhood projects, ideas that Ballard has supported.

They’ve also discussed plans for decentralizing Indianapolis Public Schools, but Ballard has not yet weighed in on those plans.

The new council dynamics—with Democrats strongly in the majority—will test Ballard’s ability to reach across the aisle. If he is unable or unwilling to do so, he risks getting little accomplished in his second term.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Actually...
    what cost Melina Kennedy the election was certainly not being "negative," but that she refused to attack Ballard on the things he was the most vulnerable on - corporate welfare and insider deals. She never hit Ballard on the $33.5 million giveaway to the Pacers wile libraries were closing and the parks budget was slashed. She didn't hit him on the ACS 50 year parking meter deal, the Broad Ripple Parking Garage that enriches Keystone, or many of the other insider deals.. She had so much ammunition and never fired a shot.

    The fact is both parties are deeply involved with those insider deals, and she as an insider herself, wasn't going to upset the apple cart by going after them even though Ballard was vulnerable on those issues.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT