IBJNews

Analysts: Simon unlikely to buy Capital Shopping

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc. is unlikely to buy Capital Shopping Centres Group Plc because it will take too long for rents to rise enough to justify a price its U.K. counterpart would accept, according to Barclays Capital real estate analysts.

“The economics of an acquisition appear difficult to justify at levels that could get CSCG shareholders interested,” analysts Ross Smotrich and Aaron Guy said in a note to clients Tuesday.

Indianapolis-based Simon, the largest U.S. mall owner, made a conditional offer of 425 a pence share for Capital Shopping on Dec. 15, valuing the U.K. company at 2.9 billion pounds, or $4.6 billion. Simon attached several conditions to its proposal, including that Capital Shopping drop a planned cash-and-shares purchase of the Trafford Shopping Centre in Manchester that would give seller Peel Group a 25 percent stake in Capital Shopping.

“If the Trafford acquisition is completed, SPG would find itself at a material disadvantage to acquire CSCG in the medium term,” said Smotrich, who works in New York for the investment banking unit of Barclays Plc, and Guy, who is based in London. “Any future plan would become materially more expensive and complicated, leaving Simon with few options.”

Simon wants to acquire a portfolio of malls in the U.K. that couldn’t be replicated in a market where planning consents for new shopping centers are hard to obtain, the analysts said. Buying Capital Shopping also would give Simon’s tenants an opportunity to open stores outside the U.S., they said.

Another attraction of Capital Shopping for Simon, which already has a 5.1 percent stake in the company, is the potential for rent increases at its stores. Capital Shopping’s rents are 20 percent below the market average, according to the Barclays report.

“It will ultimately be challenging for SPG to underwrite a more aggressive firm bid given that much of the value will take years to realize,” the analysts said.

Simon’s tactics are “eerily similar” to its unsuccessful efforts to buy General Growth Properties Inc., Smotrich and Guy said. They include offering financing at better terms than a third party and making indicative offers through press releases.

Simon has until Jan. 12 to make a firm bid for Capital Shopping or abandon its pursuit, U.K. regulators said Dec. 17.

Capital Shopping, which delayed a shareholder vote on the Peel transaction to Jan. 26 from Monday, has refused to allow Simon access to its books, saying the offer “very substantially undervalues the company and its prospects.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Best use of cash stockpile
    How about spending a small portion of your cash on buying the Circle Center Mall next to your headquarters ?

    That would bail out the insolvent Capital Improvement Board (CIB) which is burdened with construction debt that has a ever extended balloon payment they will never be able to pay.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT