IBJNews

Analysts: Simon unlikely to buy Capital Shopping

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc. is unlikely to buy Capital Shopping Centres Group Plc because it will take too long for rents to rise enough to justify a price its U.K. counterpart would accept, according to Barclays Capital real estate analysts.

“The economics of an acquisition appear difficult to justify at levels that could get CSCG shareholders interested,” analysts Ross Smotrich and Aaron Guy said in a note to clients Tuesday.

Indianapolis-based Simon, the largest U.S. mall owner, made a conditional offer of 425 a pence share for Capital Shopping on Dec. 15, valuing the U.K. company at 2.9 billion pounds, or $4.6 billion. Simon attached several conditions to its proposal, including that Capital Shopping drop a planned cash-and-shares purchase of the Trafford Shopping Centre in Manchester that would give seller Peel Group a 25 percent stake in Capital Shopping.

“If the Trafford acquisition is completed, SPG would find itself at a material disadvantage to acquire CSCG in the medium term,” said Smotrich, who works in New York for the investment banking unit of Barclays Plc, and Guy, who is based in London. “Any future plan would become materially more expensive and complicated, leaving Simon with few options.”

Simon wants to acquire a portfolio of malls in the U.K. that couldn’t be replicated in a market where planning consents for new shopping centers are hard to obtain, the analysts said. Buying Capital Shopping also would give Simon’s tenants an opportunity to open stores outside the U.S., they said.

Another attraction of Capital Shopping for Simon, which already has a 5.1 percent stake in the company, is the potential for rent increases at its stores. Capital Shopping’s rents are 20 percent below the market average, according to the Barclays report.

“It will ultimately be challenging for SPG to underwrite a more aggressive firm bid given that much of the value will take years to realize,” the analysts said.

Simon’s tactics are “eerily similar” to its unsuccessful efforts to buy General Growth Properties Inc., Smotrich and Guy said. They include offering financing at better terms than a third party and making indicative offers through press releases.

Simon has until Jan. 12 to make a firm bid for Capital Shopping or abandon its pursuit, U.K. regulators said Dec. 17.

Capital Shopping, which delayed a shareholder vote on the Peel transaction to Jan. 26 from Monday, has refused to allow Simon access to its books, saying the offer “very substantially undervalues the company and its prospects.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Best use of cash stockpile
    How about spending a small portion of your cash on buying the Circle Center Mall next to your headquarters ?

    That would bail out the insolvent Capital Improvement Board (CIB) which is burdened with construction debt that has a ever extended balloon payment they will never be able to pay.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT