Noble Roman's profit up, revenue down

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Noble Roman’s Inc. late yesterday reported a larger profit in the second quarter, primarily due to its continuing efforts to cut expenses by replacing company-owned restaurants with franchises.

The Indianapolis-based franchisor of Noble Roman’s Pizza and Tuscano’s Italian Style Subs said quarterly profit increased 5 percent, to $415,234, or 2 cents per share, compared with the same time frame last year.

Revenue, however, fell 21 percent, to $1.9 million. The company attributed the drop to a decrease in sales of franchise agreements.

In the most recent quarter, Noble Roman’s reduced overhead and operating costs by 34 percent, to $1 million, compared with the year-ago quarter.

Only two of Noble Roman’s company-owned restaurants, which are used for training and demonstration purposes, remain open.

The company said it continues to pursue growth by putting locations in “non-traditional venues” such as hospitals, military bases, universities, convenience stores and hotels. 

The company also hopes to increase sales by adding a “take-and-bake” pizza to its menu. The pizza so far is offered at 22 grocery stores, with two more expecting to have it available within the next few weeks, the company said.

A “grab-n-go” sub will be available as well to franchise owners of dual Noble Roman’s Pizza and Tuscano’s Subs franchises.




Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. "This was a very localized, Indiana issue," he said. As in, Indiana failed to expand Medicaid to cover its poor citizens resulting in the loss of essential medical services, including this EMS company. Well done, Indiana GOP. Here are the real death panels: GOP state governments who refuse to expand Medicaid for political reasons.

  2. In the "one for all, all for none" socialist doctrine the sick die...this plus obama"care" equates to caucasian genocide plus pushed flight to cities thus further eroding the conservative base and the continualed spiral toward complete liberal/progressive/marxist America.

  3. There is a simple reason why WISH is not reporting on this story. LIN has others stations in different markets that are affiliated with CBS. Reporting about CBS blindsiding WISH/LIN due to CBS's greed and bullying tatics would risk any future negoations LIN will have with CBS in other markets.

  4. My best always! Dave Wilson

  5. How did Columbus, Ohio pull off a car share service without a single dollar of public subsidies? They must not have a mayor who is on the take like Indianapolis. Daimler Benz offers Columbus residents their Smart Cars on a market-driven basis: "This has some neat features. Cars don’t have to be picked up and dropped off at fixed points. You find one with your smart phone based on GPS, and drop it off anywhere in the service area you can find a spot – even at a meter. These cars aren’t required to feed the meter so you get free on street parking while using them. I was told this system was put in place on a market basis without subsidies – and that the vendor actually pays the city for the use of the meters." http://www.urbanophile.com/2014/05/26/checking-in-on-columbus/