IBJNews

Baldwin move a win for Lauth, a setback for downtown

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The departure of trucking and auto fleet insurer Baldwin & Lyons Inc. from downtown's Landmark Center to The Congressional in Carmel is a blow for the central business district and a bonanza for Lauth Property Group.

Baldwin plans to vacate 81,000 square feet in the Landmark Center at 1099 N. Meridian St. when its lease expires in August, relocating to Carmel to take about 110,000 square feet in The Congressional at 111 Congressional Blvd.

The company plans to spend $20 million to $30 million to buy the 181,000-square-foot office building from Lauth and build out its space, according to a statement from the Indiana Economic Development Corp.

Lauth bought the building in February 2012 from Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. for $7.1 million and spent about $2 million on renovations including lobby improvements and a new roof. The build-out of Baldwin's space could run about $5 million, or $45 per foot, industry sources said. The company is expected to spend another $5 million or more on technology, furniture and equipment.

That would leave a sale price between $15 million and $20 million, an impressive return on Lauth's investment. The arrival of Baldwin & Lyons would make the building about 90-percent occupied. When Lauth stepped in, the building was just 30 percent occupied and owner REI Real Estate Services had deeded the property to its lender.

Lauth President Michael Jones declined to disclose a sales price, citing a confidentiality agreement.

"Real estate is all about timing," he said. "We were a proud owner and excited at the opportunity to buy a great asset in a thriving corridor."

Baldwin & Lyons is expected to take most of the space HSBC Bank vacated at the height of the mortgage crisis. Lauth also has its headquarters in the building.

"There's no question Lauth comes out of this smelling like a rose," said Jon Owens, vice president and principal in the local office of Cassidy Turley. "Whatever debt they took on goes away and they make a healthy profit."

Meantime, the Baldwin & Lyons move is a fresh blow to the troubled, 298,000-square-foot Landmark Center, which has been hemorrhaging tenants in the last few years, the largest of which was Anthem. The 12-story building, last owned by Michigan-based Quantum Investments, is in receivership.

Issues with the building include deferred maintenance and a big parking downside: Most of its parking sits under the nearby Interstate overpass.

Owens said LNR Property, the servicer on the loan for Landmark Center, might auction the property. A buyer willing to take a chance could buy it well below replacement value and potentially reap a windfall like Lauth's in Carmel.

While it's tough for downtown to lose such a large employer and office user, Owens said, there wasn't much the city could have done. There aren't comparable buildings available for purchase downtown. 

"It's an unfortunate situation where one submarket loses and one is a winnner," Owens said. "We just don't have enough inbound demand from office users to offset some of the consolidation and right-sizing some of the larger users in the downtown market have done over the last decade or so, particularly the banks."

Rich Forslund and Matt Waggoner of Summit Realty represented Baldwin & Lyons on the deal, and Rick Trimpe and John Vandenbark of CBRE represented Lauth.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Maybe
    Congratulations Lauth Co, maybe you could pay back some of the money you received from the banks during your two bankrupcies.
  • Au Revoir, Indy
    "It's an unfortunate situation where one submarket loses and one is a winnner," Owens said. "We just don't have enough inbound demand from office users to offset some of the consolidation and right-sizing some of the larger users in the downtown market have done over the last decade or so, particularly the banks." What a load. Nobody wants to be downtown. Nobody wants to be in Marion County. Very soon, nobody will be. Good job, Mayor McJet-Setter.
  • HELP!!!!!!!!!!
    And how much in tax credits could the Star expect if they move here? No doubt Gannett thinks they could produce this paper just as well from Illinois.
  • Indy Star?
    Will this be where the Indianapolis Star moves to? It kinda makes sense seeing as WTHR is across the street.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT