Budget could spur talks of school consolidation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana lawmakers may have found a way to spur the consolidation of small school districts without jumping into the politically unpopular issue: Starve small districts of state funding to financially push them toward merger talks with other districts.

The latest version of the state budget proposes big cuts to the state's tiniest school districts. The budget plan would eliminate extra grants to small schools but direct additional money — up to $100,000 — to districts with at least 500 students to help them make up for that loss.

It's an intentional move by lawmakers to convey a message that's considered too touchy to push outright: Districts with fewer than 500 students need to seriously consider consolidating.

"I hope it will force the discussion," said Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville.

Superintendent Fran Thoele, who oversees the single K-12 school with 164 students in New Harmony, said it would be more honest for lawmakers to pass a bill mandating consolidation rather than taking away funding until the handful of districts with fewer than 500 students are forced to merge.

The budget would reduce New Harmony's funding from about $1.5 million in 2011 to about $1 million in 2012 — a cut of about a third. The district has enough money to keep going on its own for the next two years, Thoele estimated, but could face difficult decisions in the future.

New Harmony's K-12 school is a big part of the fabric of the historic town, which was the site of an 1800s utopian community that believed in free education. If the district merged with a nearby school corporation, Thoele fears New Harmony's close-knit and high-performing school would close, hurting the Wabash River town about 20 miles outside Evansville.

"It would be sad," Thoele said. "It's such a wonderful community. It's where education really flourished in Indiana early, and it's going to lose its educational system."

But supporters of larger districts question whether it really makes sense to have an entire district — and the costs associated with it — for such a small number of students.

A 2007 report by the Indiana Commission on Local Government Reform said districts should have at least 2,000 students to maximize student academics and cost effectiveness. In 2009, Gov. Mitch Daniels pushed legislation to force districts with fewer than 1,000 students to combine their central operations with others unless they are already the only district in the county. Daniels argued that many small districts simply don't have the resources to offer the wide range of classes students need to be successful, including advanced placement classes and other upper-level offerings.

Daniels' proposal was promptly killed by lawmakers, and Kenley said it's unlikely similar legislation will gain momentum anytime soon. Many lawmakers are wary of stepping into the local politics of merging schools — a debate often caught up in emotion as local residents fight for their schools, their sports teams and even their mascots.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett said districts need to take a hard look at their academic offerings on their own and see if they provide the resources that will help their students compete.

"It is incumbent upon schools and communities to realign themselves to afford their children that chance," Bennett said. "If they can't provide competitive opportunities for their kids, I think they should then begin to make different decisions."

Lawmakers plan to hash out a final version of the budget before the legislative session ends April 29. House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, said House budget negotiators will consider the provisions dealing with small schools, which were added by the Senate.

"We need to have some incentives out there for the smallest of corporations to consider consolidation," Bosma said. "On the other hand, there are some smaller corporations that are performing well and want to maintain their independence. We'll have to try to balance that."

Leaders at small districts are watching to see whether the cuts will remain. Union School Corp. in Modoc, about 20 miles northwest of Richmond, would face a 15 percent cut from 2011 to 2012. The district has discussed consolidation before, but the effort stalled, Superintendent Philip Wray said.

"I don't know how much we can cut," Wray said. "This could possibly start that discussion back up."


  • True Cost
    Would you be able to get that same teacher for $15K. Wouldn't that be the true salary after all the benefits and additional costs to employ them?
  • Check your facts Thundermutt
    Thundermutt I believe your comment demonstrates your lack of understanding of the state of our current education system. Inner city and larger school districts pay a premium for their teaching staff - this is not to attract high quality staff but to offset for the conditions under which they work. It's much akin to hazard pay, except in this case it covers oversized classes, behavioral issues, and crime problems. Do I think you can get a teacher to work in a small school for $30k? Absolutely. The same can't be said for IPS.
    • $30K for a teacher?
      Joe, do you really think you'll get highly motivated and highly qualified teachers to move to the country and teach math, physics, robotics and computers for $30,000 a year?
      • Opportunities
        And how many students at Medora get the opportunity to play football? Or golf? Or softball? Or Speech Team?
      • Bigger Schools
        I taught in a small school (250 kids 7-12th grades), and those kids were really handicapped by a lack of resources. The library did the best it could, but it was hopelessly out-of-date. Any school with less than 500 students should consolidate.
      • Future leaders
        There are super large schools like Carmel. How many varsity football and basketball teams does it have? Probably one each, but there are 5,000 students there, now many will make the team? My point is, with smaller schools there is more opportunity to play sports and develop leadership than in large school where only the very talented get to play.
        • Misguided......
          The effort for the past 30-40 years of "consolidating" into larger schools on huge lots of land is misleading. Any money saved by the economies of scale for services within the building are quickly lost by the created need for transportation. The average price to run a school bus per school year is between $25,000 and $30,000. This is per bus, per year. The resulting financial loss is passed onto our education system in the way of larger classes and reduced teachers. I for one would prefer a teacher for $30,000 than a bus. Economies of scale work for somethings when you are trying to create a similar product of large quantities, but what are we creating with education? An army? Each child will have different learning styles and learning paces. The teacher used to be able to learn from the child and accomodate their needs, now they must babysit 40 students and pass enough to keep their jobs. The answer isn't fewer larger schools. The answer lies with proper placement and policies that drive smarter land use and reduced cost.

        Post a comment to this story

        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

        2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

        3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

        4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

        5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.