IBJNews

City approval of Citizens Energy deal could come in May

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Citizens Energy should have completed the majority of its due diligence of the city’s water and sewer utilities, which it plans to acquire, by the end of this month, said Citizens CEO Carey Lykins.

Unless Citizens finds something on the books it can’t swallow, a vote in the City-County Council on Mayor Greg Ballard’s proposed deal could happen in mid- to late May, say city officials.

The $1.9 billion deal includes an estimated $425 million that would be available for city infrastructure improvements, including roads, bridges and sidewalks. It’s the stuff businesses like to see when considering where to set up shop.
 

LykinsLykins

But Ballard, who has been touting the deal in a series of public meetings since March 10, is also pitching the proceeds as a way to lure and retain young entrepreneurs. He envisions some of the deal proceeds going into bike lanes, an amenity attractive to the young, “creative class.”

He said the cash flowing into the city also might help demolish at least some of the 4,500 abandoned houses plaguing the city.

The “vast majority” of the money will go toward what Ballard classifies as “dry infrastructure” improvements, however.

Critics have questioned whether proposals from other firms might have raised more upfront cash for the city. Ballard contends Citizens, as a public trust, ensures a stable future for the utilities and should keep downward pressure on rates because of merger synergies

The city bought Indianapolis Water from Merrillville-based utility NiSource in 2002. The terms of that deal froze rates for several years, during which time the water utility needed major infrastructure improvements. As such, the city has asked state utility regulators to raise rates 35 percent. Meanwhile, a city refinancing of water utility debt backfired amid the collapse in financial markets, leading to a 12-percent emergency water rate hike.

Ballard’s critics say turning over the utilities to Citizens will remove a layer of accountability by eliminating City-County Council oversight.

“What we have right now is the appearance of accountability,” said Michael Huber, the city’s director of enterprise development.

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission must OK the deal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT