The Internal Revenue Service has refunded part of a former downtown movie theater owner’s payroll tax payments after
he argued that Conseco Fieldhouse caused an undue hardship on his business.
Ted Bulthaup, who operated Hollywood Bar and Filmworks on South Meridian Street before closing it in 2006, touted the IRS
decision in an advertisement he purchased in the May 17 issue of IBJ. His ad was a lengthy diatribe refuting the
results of a recent study that found the Indiana Pacers have a positive economic impact on the city.
What’s unusual about the tax case is that such refunds, which are based on economic hardship, more typically are associated
with natural disasters such as earthquakes and hurricanes.
“It boils down to something like [Hurricane] Katrina,” Bulthaup told IBJ. “That’s what the
general rule was put together for. You just have to prove your disaster, which we did admirably well.”
The IRS granted Bulthaup's refund in early April after he convinced the agency that increased parking rates following
the opening of Conseco Fieldhouse in 1999 led to a severe downturn in his business. Bulthaup said he skirted payroll tax obligations
in order to keep his theater open.
He failed to pay payroll taxes for about a three-year period before he closed his theater. Bulthaup estimated he owed as
much as $90,000, which he paid before filing for a refund. He declined to divulge exactly how much was refunded, describing
it as "mid five figures."
The IRS decision came three years after Bulthaup and his attorney made the request for relief.
“The reasonable cause that was established was based upon the economic circumstances that resulted from Conseco Fieldhouse
opening less than two blocks from Hollywood,” said his attorney, James Gilday. “That was considered and accepted
to be a circumstance beyond the taxpayer’s control.”
A spokeswoman for the Indiana office of the IRS declined to comment on Bulthaup’s case, citing federal disclosure regulations that prohibit her from divulging details about individual tax matters.
The Capital Improvement Board, which commissioned the economic impact study and is wrangling with the basketball team over
who will pay at least $15 million in annual fieldhouse operating costs, was among Bulthaup’s targets in the newspaper
advertisement. Pacers executives, who say the team is losing money, want CIB to assume the cost.
CIB President Ann Lathrop said the board never received any type of notification from the IRS about Bulthaup’s claim.
She declined to comment further.
Bulthaup closed the 15-year-old downtown fixture in October 2006 to focus on a similarly styled theater that serves alcohol
and food, which he opened in the suburban Chicago community of Woodridge in 2003. He since has opened another theater, in
nearby Naperville.
Bulthaup had a long-standing feud with the city of Indianapolis and CIB over parking issues following the arena’s opening,
which he blamed for driving patrons from his theater.
While operating Hollywood Bar and Filmworks, Bulthaup founded the Indianapolis Downtown Restaurant Association, which spearheaded
an unsuccessful effort to persuade the city and CIB to lower event parking rates.
The downtown restaurant association that Bulthaup founded now is affiliated with the Indiana Restaurant Association, led
by John Livengood. He recalled Bulthaup as being “very aggressive” in standing up for what he believed.
Livengood agrees with Bulthaup’s assessment that the Pacers' economic impact on downtown is minimal, at least for
bars and restaurants. Livengood pointed to the recent study commissioned by CIB, which shows the team’s home games generate
just $175,300 annually in city food and beverage taxes.
The food and beverage tax, which applies to sales at restaurants and bars, was raised by one percentage point, to 2 percent,
in Indianapolis to help fund the construction of Lucas Oil Stadium.
Livengood said he hopes the Pacers stay but also wants the public to realize sports teams often don’t create as much
business for downtown establishments as one might think.
“Everybody always comes to us to pay for this stuff,” he said, “and we’re not the big beneficiary,
in every case.”
The study, released May 10 by Chicago-based Hunden Strategic Partners, found the city would lose nearly $18 million in tax
revenue and other expenses if the Pacers were to leave Indianapolis.
It also said the Pacers and Indiana Fever contribute an estimated $55 million a year to the Indianapolis economy.
The Indianapolis Bond Bank paid Chicago-based Hunden Strategic Partners to perform the study. The firm is led by Rob Hunden,
a former economic development official for the bond bank during the Goldsmith administration.
That relationship has led critics of any plan to provide financial assistance to the Pacers to question the results.

















IBJ Conversations
25 Comments
Add Comment
1) That does mean they should get taxpayer money when they just have a bad business model, they have grown dependent on public subsidy for fat salaries and big facilities and they should fix their business model instead. Sports teams could and would do fix it only when they are forced to. That time should be now, nationally.
2) That the economic impact they claim in order to justify getting taxpayer money has been proven again and again to be a big lie by every independent authority. Only when insiders with special interests do studies is that somehow justified, those studies are demonstrably flawed if not outright fraud and the public should be outraged. A local government agency reported that the top 10 downtown restaurants suffered an annual decrease in customers/sales for the first 3 years the Fieldhouse was open until they stopped issuing the report because they did not like bad news and the City Council Asset Management Committee found that the neighborhood was right in pointing a finger at the Fieldhouse as the reason.
Note also that a city can have great fabric like the Speedway, the Childrenâ??s Museum, the Zoo without taxpayerâ??s picking up the tab.
And no I am not a sports person, but how does that justify taking taxpayer money to lower the price of a ticket for someone like yourself that is a sports person. And that is not paying a little more taxes, that is estimated by the CIB itself at $400 per family per year, sorry but that is not appropriate. All teams should have to make it based on their own revenue, just like any other business.
After 15 years of downtown, even though I love downtowns which is why I built the first new downtown theater in Indy in over 60 years, and operated the first one in two decades, the decision making by Indy government, which I had lots of dealing s with on lots of issues, was so bad I decided never to make myself vulnerable to that kind of thing again. Cook County is even worse in that department than Indy. I know one theater owner that has to renew 94 permits annually, hires a law firm who does nothing but renewals for people. Expense of building is much greater in any downtown than a suburb. Also, will never build a theater that needs a security guard and I knew this suburb very in the next county over (DuPage) very well. And as for Indy suburb, aside from having enough with local government, I won't pay taxes to sports team (see my answer to HKS). Yes, as cities grow parking rates do go up. But when you essentially only have people in quantity living in suburbs they won't pay the higher prices, at least not often. Cities that provide free or discount parking to make their downtowns work have huge success stories and I gave Indy government materials on lots of examples, (and they at least realized it for Circle Center Mall but then, as I am not a basketball team owner, I am not a Simon either. They realize it was and is essential for retail to thrive in the downtown mall, but don't get it that all downtown retail needs that asset to be over-the-top successful, if they did it right like some other examples, downtown would be ten years ahead of where it is now) It was time to go, for me it was the right decision. While parking rates might not have kept you away from my place, I had literally thousands and thousands of customer comment stories the contrary, as did almost all other downtown establishments, all of who told Peterson, many of whom signed petitions and wrote letters, and it was statistically provable - just like the affect that is documented in every single academic, independent study of this issue, and there are many. The Pacers study is a pure fraud.
I notice when you relocated your business to Chicago you didn't put it downtown. If you had you would have faced the same problems you did here with parking only they would be even more extreme parking rates. Sure, you've got more people living in downtown Chicago but it appears that you decided that maybe your type of business is not best served being downtown.
So, you made a good decision to move to the Chicago suburbs where you can have ample free parking. Why didn't you attempt to move somewhere on the north side of Indy here? It seems that you love to talk about your success in Chicago but you may have had pretty strong success here too if you'd just made the same move. Once a downtown starts to mature more as it has in Indy you are naturally going to see parking rates increase over time as space is at more of a premium than during the 70's or 80's.
Personally, the parking issue never kept me away from your theater. Anyone that knows downtown well at all can almost always find a free spot within a relatively short walk or at worst pay a very small fee with a relatively short walk. Your food was pretty mediocre at best but it was still a fun night every now and then.
How about opening something on the eastside Ted? The intersection of Washington and Franklin where the old Service Merchandise would be great. Just an idea.
"Public Dollars, Private Stadiums: The Battle over Building Sports Stadiums" by Kevin J. Delaney. "Field of Schemes: How the Great Stadium Swindle Turns Public Money into Private Profit" by Neil de Mause, or
"Sports, Jobs, and Taxes: The Economic Impact of Sports Teams & Stadiums" by Roger G. Noll (Brookings Institute). Then you'll know the truth and you'll know the Pacers and the CIB are lying in their new study.
The Star ran his whining tear-stained quotes in the paper for a year before he bought his own page of yelps and moans
Congrats Bulthaup - I'm sure others in disasters couldn't use that money
Maybe he should come back and lease the dead space on the top floor of the mall, but with the UA Theater there already, I doubt Simon would entertain that thought.
Adequate, affordable parking exists around downtown Indianapolis whether or not the Pacers are at home. My opinion is that Teddy seen his business revenues going down considerably and didn't want to pay his taxes. Fortunately for him America's 'free market' system of economics allowed him to get out of paying his taxes by using tax code intended for victims of earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes.
Ineed, the Pacers are a disaster, but they're not *that* type of disaster.
The parking costs, and the diffiulty in getting clients to the restaurant during the construction phase ruined the restaurant. I loved that place.
As far as Ted goes, really poor food, a complete lack of remodeling, indifferent staff, and a myriad of other reasons caused his business decline. The fact that he would demand police arrest individuals on a regular basis in front of his business led me and several others to write him off.
His late election character hit piece advertisement against peterson didn't help. SO, he didn't pay employee withholdings for three years? Did he pay himself? What a jackass.
That said, I am sick of the rest of us paying for a millionaire's dailliances