Daniels signs 80 bills into law, including budget

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels signed 80 bills into law Tuesday, including a new $28 billion state budget and redrawn political maps that will help shape elections for the next decade.

Daniels also signed two immigration bills: one denying in-state tuition rates at state-supported universities for illegal immigrants and another revoking some tax credits for businesses that hire illegal immigrants. The bills spurred protests this week that led to five young illegal immigrants being arrested on trespassing charges at Daniels' office.

Daniels also signed bills to cut the corporate income tax, ban texting while driving and mostly prohibit Indiana cities and counties from limiting gun possession.

Daniels praised the new state budget for including a taxpayer refund. If state reserves exceed 10 percent of budgeted spending, half the extra money would be used for pension funds and half would be given back to taxpayers. Daniels wanted all the money to go back to taxpayers, however, and said the state is no longer skipping payments to retirement funds. Directing more money toward those pensions is unnecessary, he said.

"I'm very pleased at the enactment of the automatic taxpayer refund, though I would have preferred a simpler, cleaner version that gave any refund entirely back to taxpayers," Daniels said in a statement announcing the bill signings.

The budget spends less than it takes in and leaves the state with $1 billion in reserves. It gives modest increases to public schools, though critics say the school funding formula included in the budget will hurt some districts, especially the smallest of Indiana's school districts.

Daniels vetoed one bill, which would have required the majority of the board of trustees at Indiana University and Ball State University to be Indiana residents and required all members of the IU board be United State citizens. Daniels says requiring that by law is too "narrow and provincial" given the schools' global scope.

"The day may well come when these world-class institutions will want to include illustrious alumni from around the globe on their boards," Daniels said. "The universities should not be denied such opportunities, nor future governors prohibited from making such appointments."

Daniels signed into law bills that will:

— Revamp political maps for the state's nine congressional and 150 legislative districts. The Republican-drawn maps are expected to give the GOP the upper hand in seven of the state's nine congressional districts. Republicans say the new districts are more compact and keep more counties together than the redistricting plan implemented in 2001 by Democrats, who then controlled the once-a-decade redistricting based on census figures.

— Prohibit reading or typing text messages and email messages while driving. Violators would face a maximum fine of $500. Supporters say the ban would increase awareness about the danger of distracted driving and save lives, while skeptics questioned whether it could properly be enforced.

— Cut Indiana's corporate income tax rate incrementally from the current 8.5 percent to 6.5 percent in 2015. The full tax cut is estimated to cost the state about $80 million a year, and the state will make up that money by starting to tax the interest on out-of-state bonds held by Indiana companies and residents.

— Only permit local governments to ban guns from buildings that house courtrooms, meaning local ordinances banning firearms from other buildings, such as libraries, wouldn't be allowed. Sponsors say the measure won't change laws banning guns from schools and university properties.

— Ban synthetic marijuana known as spice or K2. Possessing or dealing such substances will be treated as possessing and dealing real marijuana. Several Indiana counties have local ordinances banning the substance from stores, but supporters of the bill say a state law criminalizing it is needed.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.