IBJNews

Daniels signs jobless-fund bill that unions fought

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Gov. Mitch Daniels signed into law Thursday a plan aimed at fixing Indiana's debt-ridden unemployment fund that labor unions had opposed because it will reduce jobless benefits for some people while softening business tax increases.

Daniels signed the bill before reporters in his Statehouse office, calling it a balanced approach toward bringing the unemployment fund into balance and repaying $2 billion that's been borrowed from the federal government to pay benefits.

"Indiana had an upside-down system when we were at full employment," Daniels said. "It was going to have to be fixed sometime and that all was made dramatically worse by the recession."

The Republican-led House approved the bill Jan. 31, but House Democrats included it on their list of objectionable legislation that they said caused them to leave for Illinois on Tuesday, shutting down legislative action since then. The GOP-ruled state Senate approved it Tuesday night.

Maximum jobless benefits would remain at $390 a week under the bill, but the method of calculating payments would change starting in July 2012.

Currently, benefits are based on a worker's highest-paid quarter of a 12-month period. The new law will base benefits on a worker's total wages over a year — a change that would hurt some employees like construction workers who earn more money during summer months than in winter.

The nonpartisan Legislative Services Agency estimates the change would mean a 25-percent reduction in the state's unemployment payments, which were $1.4 billion in the 2010 budget year.

Those changes are among the grievances of union members who have crowded the Statehouse by the thousands during four days of protests this week.

"That bill takes from this economy's victims and at the same time gives corporations a humongous tax break," state AFL-CIO President Nancy Guyott said. "We just think that is tone deaf in an economy where working people are hurting."

The new law reduces business tax increases approved in 2009 that were to take effect this year. Tax revenue under the previous plan would have increased an estimated 55 percent, while the new law will see revenue go up about 30 percent.

The Daniels administration has estimated that employers will shoulder about two-thirds of the burden of paying off the unemployment fund's debt.

Daniels said he had no concerns about the business tax increases hurting the state's economy.

"These changes will not move our ranking even one place as a low-tax, low-cost business state," he said. "It was necessary to have a system in which premiums and benefits were in some balance. I think it was appropriate that we worked on it from both ends."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The Fringe! Plus, the simple fact that there are so many local faves in such close proximity to each other.

  2. I remenber, watching the toll road, being built, through South Bend, when I was 10 years old. I believe, back then that it was estimated, that the toll road, would be paid for in 20 years and then it would be free. I am now 71, what happened? Since the power is in the people, by that, I mean that, we the people are in total control of everything. I, suggest that no one ever use the toll road again, let it go broke. We the people can control the price of everything, from groceries to gas, if we would just do it. If we don't pay the asking price, the sellers will lower the price and if we wait awhile, they will lower the price to what we accept as reasonable. I would like to know why a highway like interstate 94, is so well maintained, a much better highway, than the toll road, but has no tolls. I would also like to know why, a sitting governor, with a term limit, maximum of eight years, can lease, public property, for 75 years. Even though I have transponders in both of my trucks and will not be affected by the increase, I have been and will contine to avoid using the toll road. I make many trips from northern Indiana to Chicago, every year, and I prefer the better highway, I94!

  3. Coming from her background,she should be used to those kinds of advances! Menard probably figured it was ok to tuck a buck!

  4. I'm still waiting for the list of available, high quality apartments in the Village.

  5. This criminal masquerading as a lawyer obviously has serious issues. He’s been proven by his own testimony to be a pathological liar and probably has a personality disorder as he seems to be constructing a reality around himself. He places no value on truth, honesty or loyalty as evidenced by what he has done to his clients and his own family. And by the demands and lies he has made in court, it is evident he feels entitled to do and say whatever suits his purpose and everyone else is expected to nod obediently and believe him because he is, after all, Bill Super Lawyer; or BS lawyer for short. This millionaire wanna-be no longer owns anything of value; he squandered it and put everything he had into foreclosure. He has no money, house, car, boat or vacation home left to show for what he earned or what he stole. He’s just another loser without morals who will be doing time. I’m certain all of his courtroom shenanigans are antagonizing his poor victims. As Lamar said, his behavior and claims in court have been outrageous. The judge needs to be more than concerned; he needs to be judicial and end this nonsense.

ADVERTISEMENT