Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels has signed several new more bills into law, including one that will no longer require everyone
buying carryout alcohol to show identification regardless of age.
Daniels signed the law Friday that states only those appearing younger than age 40 must be carded, starting July 1. Current
law mandates carding of all individuals.
Daniels also signed a bill requiring Indiana retailers to use a computerized tracking system to identify those buying cold
medications used in making methamphetamine. Stores selling ephedrine or pseudoephedrine products will enter the identity of
customers into a multistate database that limits how much a person can buy.
Daniels vetoed a bill dealing with forfeitures, saying it went against the state constitution to take much of the proceeds
collected through forfeitures and use it for purposes other than a school fund.
IBJNews
Daniels signs measure changing Indiana alcohol ID law
Associated Press
May 13, 2011
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
 Follow IBJ's Tweets on these topics: |
||
| @IBJNews | @Propertylines | @IBJTheScore |
| @IBJArts | @IBJHealthcare | @IBJDining |
| @IBJLists | @IBJSmallbiz | |
-
To get a pay raise, the teacher must score a "4" on a rubric that only has a "4' as the highest score. therefore all the administrator has to do is mark you a '3" in one area and no pay raise. My wife's evaluation "interestingly" now is lower than the last three years and no pay raise. My brother teaches around Indy where all of a sudden the highest score is 3.25 ie frozen pay raises.This is a faulty scoring system when a teacher would have to score perfect in all categories.Meanwhile, the administrators all got pay raises and two more were hired.It will be interesting to see what the administrators spouses score.
The state needs a scoring system the rewards an effective teacher not a perfect teacher. I taught bfor 40 years and never used a scoring system that required perfection to reward my top students -
'Floundering' would seem to indicate the sport is not long for the world. Sixteen years seems like a long time to 'flounder.'
When one looks objectively at the metrics that matter; e.g., sponsorship, attendance an ratings, all are up.
Is this another of those silly hater deals where you hold the sport of today up against the sport of twenty years ago then try some cutesy, childlike comparison to validate your little straw man?
Here's another question: What is the specific purpose of television ratings?
-
It will be really nice having another parking garage across the street from the two already on Illinois's east side. And there is another huge one just north of Michigan. If we fill in the surface lot north of Vermont and tear down that ridiculously old fashioned Rink Building we can achieve something few other municipalities can boast of: a 3 full city block canyon of parking garages.
Plus, if there is a building downtown that merits imitation it is the One America tower. I propose it be the standard for all future design. And I propose we change our city name to Dystopolis. -
What is it on it's way back from? Pick one, let's discuss:
- All oval series = FAILURE
- Control AOW, Kill Sport = SUCCESS
- Quality Field versus Quantity Field = FAILURE
- Driver Death/Poor Chassis Design = FAILURE
- More American/Less Foreign Drivers = FAILURE
- More Street Courses/Less Ovals = SUCCESS
- Merger/Asset Aquire with CCWS = SUCCESS
- Penske wins all the time = SUCCESS
- LOTUS barely is 3rd Manufacturer = FAILURE
- Less Major Network TV/More Obscure TV = SUCCESS
- Traditions Sacrificed for Survival = SUCCESS
These are just a few topics....how is Indy on it's way back up? -
Chicken in a Biscuit
IBJ Featured Advertisers
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
IBJ Conversations
5 Comments
Add Comment
Commerce in this case is more for the fact of Money and the federal Standard of , this view is a part of the views of what became the civil war and the fall out of !
Filed January 01- Day 04 2011, a $33 million Dollar Tort Claim to Suit City of Bloomington Monroe County Indiana Elected & Appointed part of Tort Claim / Lawsuit is to Challenge Constitutionality of the City of Bloomington May 17,2010 letter to Arizona for Incitement of Boycott of Arizona self defense. Lawsuit filed May 2, 2011 Summons service date May 4th 2011, Cause # 53c061105ct000811
I Understand the need to been Watchfull of things...But this Move is not Constitutional, Not Ever one Buying this Stuff is in the Event seeking to carry out a crime, there for tracking such is using a law to say your guilty for a crime with out being proved to be do ing so, So this would Fall under the Guied lines of a Violation of the 5th Amendment! http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/5th-amendment.html
I also thing think this could be so challenged thru a tort Claim suing using Direct or Indirect Constitutional Contempt them suing a suit and laws as such as US title 42 usc section 1983, I say under the Indiana State Constitution section 12 Section 12. Openess of the courts, Speedy trial
Section 12. All courts shall be open; and every person, for injury done to him in his person, property, or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law. Justice shall be administered freely, and without purchase; completely, and without denial; speedily, and without delay. Could file such a case free then so fight the matter of such mised views of laws.
Gibbons V. Ogden} 9 Wheaton 1 (1824). Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall, Upholds Only Congress can regulate Inter States Commerce.
Commerce in this case is more for the fact of Money and the federal Standard of , this view is a part of the views of what became the civil war and the fall out of!
Anderson of bloomington Indiana