IBJNews

Drugmakers collaborate to facilitate drug tests

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co. and two other major drugmakers say they are collaborating in a global project aimed at getting patient tests of experimental drugs up and running more quickly and efficiently.

They are each contributing to a database of doctors, hospitals and clinics vetted to participate in the complex tests needed to determine whether an experimental medicine is effective and safe.

The effort could eventually mean new medicines will get approved and reach patients sooner.

New Brunswick, N.J.-based Johnson & Johnson, Whitehouse Station, N.J.-based Merck & Co. will be the first partners in the venture with Lilly.

They're inviting other pharmaceutical and biotech companies to add their own information to their databank that J&J's Janssen Research & Development unit set up.

It's an unusual partnership in an industry where drugmakers compete vigorously for patients and billions of dollars in medicine sales — and a sign that companies are willing to work together more amid a tidal wave of generic competition to top-selling drugs that's wiping out billions of dollars in annual revenue.

"The current clinical trial environment is inefficient, costly and unsustainable," Dr. Andreas Koester, Janssen's head of clinical trial innovation and external alliances, said in a prepared statement. "We are enthusiastic about working with other industry leaders to collectively apply our expertise, capabilities and shared passion for advancing science and improving lives."

The goal is to eliminate duplicative, time-wasting steps that increase drugmakers' costs and stretch out the time it takes to get a new medicine approved. Currently, that costs roughly $1 billion and takes about a decade, from laboratory and animal testing through usually three rounds of studies on increasing numbers of patients.

Every time a drugmaker wants to start patient testing, it must find dozens, sometimes hundreds, of doctors and university scientists to run the studies and recruit participants from among patients at their hospitals and clinics. Those conducting the tests must be trained on how to select appropriate patients and explain risks to them, keep detailed records and oversee nurses and others making sure each patient gets an experimental drug or a placebo as scheduled, along with follow-up tests for months or even years.

The database will give those working on experimental drugs a one-time approval process and drugmakers a big pool of ready, qualified scientists with known expertise.

Over the last decade or so, drugmakers have been teaming up more to develop new drugs, sharing the costs and risks along with the profits when a drug pans out.

The new collaboration builds on another partnership announced two months ago, called TransCelerate BioPharma, that includes 10 top U.S. and European drugmakers. They aim to reduce costs and speed up drug testing, and identified the new database as one way to do that.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Many serial killer types and psychopaths work as lowly bureaucrats, just waiting to impose their wrath on a powerless person, child, or pet. Don't forget, the BTK killer was a dog catcher.

  2. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

  3. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

  4. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

  5. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

ADVERTISEMENT