IBJNews

Drugmakers collaborate to facilitate drug tests

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co. and two other major drugmakers say they are collaborating in a global project aimed at getting patient tests of experimental drugs up and running more quickly and efficiently.

They are each contributing to a database of doctors, hospitals and clinics vetted to participate in the complex tests needed to determine whether an experimental medicine is effective and safe.

The effort could eventually mean new medicines will get approved and reach patients sooner.

New Brunswick, N.J.-based Johnson & Johnson, Whitehouse Station, N.J.-based Merck & Co. will be the first partners in the venture with Lilly.

They're inviting other pharmaceutical and biotech companies to add their own information to their databank that J&J's Janssen Research & Development unit set up.

It's an unusual partnership in an industry where drugmakers compete vigorously for patients and billions of dollars in medicine sales — and a sign that companies are willing to work together more amid a tidal wave of generic competition to top-selling drugs that's wiping out billions of dollars in annual revenue.

"The current clinical trial environment is inefficient, costly and unsustainable," Dr. Andreas Koester, Janssen's head of clinical trial innovation and external alliances, said in a prepared statement. "We are enthusiastic about working with other industry leaders to collectively apply our expertise, capabilities and shared passion for advancing science and improving lives."

The goal is to eliminate duplicative, time-wasting steps that increase drugmakers' costs and stretch out the time it takes to get a new medicine approved. Currently, that costs roughly $1 billion and takes about a decade, from laboratory and animal testing through usually three rounds of studies on increasing numbers of patients.

Every time a drugmaker wants to start patient testing, it must find dozens, sometimes hundreds, of doctors and university scientists to run the studies and recruit participants from among patients at their hospitals and clinics. Those conducting the tests must be trained on how to select appropriate patients and explain risks to them, keep detailed records and oversee nurses and others making sure each patient gets an experimental drug or a placebo as scheduled, along with follow-up tests for months or even years.

The database will give those working on experimental drugs a one-time approval process and drugmakers a big pool of ready, qualified scientists with known expertise.

Over the last decade or so, drugmakers have been teaming up more to develop new drugs, sharing the costs and risks along with the profits when a drug pans out.

The new collaboration builds on another partnership announced two months ago, called TransCelerate BioPharma, that includes 10 top U.S. and European drugmakers. They aim to reduce costs and speed up drug testing, and identified the new database as one way to do that.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT