IBJNews

Duke Realty reports leasing at 5-year high

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Duke Realty Corp. handled more leasing activity last quarter than it has in any first quarter in five years, the Indianapolis-based real estate investment trust said on Wednesday.

The company, which reported first-quarter results in line with analyst expectations, said it leased 5.5 million square feet of space during the three-month period that ended March 31.

The company reported funds from operation, a key measure for REITS, of $62 million, or 28 cents per share, in the quarter compared to $105.8 million, or 71 cents per share, during the same period a year ago.

Recurring FFO for the first quarter was 28 cents per share compared with 50 cents for the first quarter of 2009. Duke said the variance was primarily attributable to an increase in its weighted average share count due to a common equity offering in April 2009.

Overall, Duke reported a first-quarter net loss of about $15.3 million on revenue of $335.7 million compared to a gain of $23.2 million on revenue of $322.4 million a year ago.

"We are beginning to see signs that the economy is improving," Duke Chairman and CEO Dennis D. Oklak said in a statement.

During the quarter, the company made several moves to deleverage its balance sheet, including the repurchase of more than $312 million in bonds. The company issued $250 million in new bonds on April 1. It now has $880 million available to pay upcoming debt maturities, including $850 million on a line of credit and $30 million in cash.

During the quarter, Duke sold properties worth $122.6 million, none of which are located in Indiana. And the company acquired 20 percent of two office buildings in South Florida for $8.7 million.

Overall portfolio occupancy edged up to 87.5 percent, from 87.2 percent on Dec. 31, 2009.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why should citizens rates increase forever to basically reduce Dukes cost to operate in the future? They will have no meter readers, no connect/disconnect personnel and will need fewer lineman to handle the same number of customers. Add to that the ability to replace customer service by giving detailed information electronically. Why do we have to subsidize the cost cutting measures of a Public Utility?

  2. In response to Sassafras, I have to ask if you relocated directly from Bloomington to Carmel? First, as you point out, Carmel is 48 square miles. Do you think it’s possible that some areas are more densely developed than others? That might explain traffic density in some places while others are pretty free moving. Second, your comment “have you ever been to Chicago--or just about any city outside of Indiana?” belies your bias. I don’t know, Sassafras, have you never been to Nashville, Columbus, OH, Cincinnati, St. Louis, Kansas City, Denver, Phoenix? They’re not a lot different in density than Indy. One more thing…I understand these comment sections are for expressing opinions, so those of us just looking for facts have to be patient, but you mention “low-density” Indy. How many cities in the US comprise 400 square miles with about 10% of that still being agricultural? Those facts certainly can impact the statistics.

  3. With all the past shady actions of Duke with utility regulators, one wonders do they really need such a huge amount? Concerned regulators not protecting ratepayers from the aggressive Duke monolith.

  4. I thought that had to be the way it was but had to ask because I wasn't sure. Thanks Again!

  5. I could be wrong, but I don't think Butler views the new dorm as mere replacements for Schwitzer and or Ross.

ADVERTISEMENT