EDITORIAL: White's plan for IPS lacks vision, innovation

 IBJ Staff
April 21, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Indianapolis Public Schools chief Eugene White disappointed on April 16 when he unveiled proposals that would merely futz around the edges of the troubled system rather than match or exceed the dramatic innovations put forth by The Mind Trust last year. This was White’s chance to show vision for improving IPS after being turned down for jobs outside the state and saying he would end his career in Indianapolis. Instead, he projected a defiant tilt toward the status quo.

White in effect said IPS is doing just fine, thank you. His plan would lightly trim administrative rosters, allow modest autonomy for top-performing schools, and create some new schools and programs for parents to choose from, but otherwise stay the course.

The Mind Trust calls for gutting the hulking administrative office and shifting $188 million in annual spending to individual school leaders, and to pay for such things as universal preschool and better salaries for teachers who would work in a network of autonomous schools. The school board would be appointed by the Indianapolis mayor and City-County Council, a notion White rejects.

The differences between the plans boil down to values: White is betting that top-down, bureaucratic, centralized control will result in better-educated children, while The Mind Trust believes in pushing decisions to the lowest level possible and giving teachers and administrators room to innovate.

Red tape versus flexibility; when was the last time overhead, regulation and sameness outperformed freedom and entrepreneurship? We can’t think of an example, either. If public education and its hidebound ways were held to the standards of the private sector, it would have gone out of business decades ago.

Citizens both inside and outside the district increasingly agree, and by playing it safe White might have inadvertently positioned himself to answer to new and impatient bosses.

As IBJ reporter J.K. Wall writes this week, reform-minded Democrats are pushing to elect more responsive IPS board members in November. If the reformers succeed, the recast board might push the 64-year-old White closer to The Mind Trust proposals.

White also shouldn’t forget that the Legislature has been receptive to education reform in recent years, and that redistricting likely will increase the number of Republicans in the 2013 General Assembly. They might approve reforms that would turn up the heat on him.

Moreover, White’s dallying might inadvertently draw even more funding to The Mind Trust. The not-for-profit is on the verge of closing a large fundraising campaign. Raising any amount of money is challenging in these times, but for a group to rake in a stunning $18 million seemingly at will says something about the frustration with public education.

White could have floated a bold proposal that would have accelerated the improvements in graduation rates he has overseen.

But, possibly looking over his shoulder at a board also mired in the status quo, he whiffed. That’s a shame not only for White, but also for the board and for the children he is charged to educate.•


To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing