IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: City's IT sector finding a groove

IBJ Staff
January 8, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Indianapolis has spent more than a decade craving a robust information technology sector. Now there are signs that craving is being satisfied.

Chief among those signs is the sale Dec. 22 of Aprimo Inc. for $525 million, about 6-1/2 times its annual sales. The company founded here in 1998 by Bill Godfrey and Rob McLaughlin is a giant in the world of measured marketing. Together with other local firms that create marketing-management software, Aprimo has helped make a name for Indianapolis in that growing software niche.

So why is Aprimo’s sale to Dayton, Ohio-based Teradata a good thing? Because the stock options owned by current and former employees of the firm now become cash, some of which will, theoretically, be used to start new tech firms here. And outside investors who put capital into Aprimo now have firsthand experience with successful Indianapolis software entrepreneurs and cash that they, too, can use to back new ideas.

Every success story adds to the city’s appeal as a technology hub. The difference between the sale of Aprimo in December and one of the city’s first successful tech firms, Software Artistry, which sold in 1997 for $200 million, is that the city is now better positioned to capitalize.

Software Artistry, which employed Godfrey and McLaughlin and gave them the expertise and financial wherewithal to form Aprimo, was sold when the city’s tech sector was in its infancy. Today, the city’s talent pool is deeper and broader thanks to the culture created by Aprimo and its peer companies.

Grass-roots groups, such as Hackers and Founders, have sprung up around the city, luring hundreds of 20- and 30-somethings to events where they network casually with other would-be entrepreneurs and technology mentors. As reported in last week’s IBJ, Hackers and Founders has 400 members and draws about 200 to its monthly meetings.

It’s not much of a stretch to imagine that some of the money from the Aprimo sale will, in the not-too-distant future, back an idea hatched at one of those meetings. Maybe a future technology success story—or stories—will result.

An entrepreneurial culture isn’t built overnight. It’s taken years of hard work, dedication and a belief that it could happen here. We’re happy for the individuals involved—and for the city as a whole—that the foundation for a successful tech sector is now in place.•

__________

To comment on these editorials, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT