IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: IPS chief leaves mixed legacy

 IBJ Staff
January 19, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Editorial

Eugene White is a towering man with an outsized personality to match. When he took the helm of the troubled Indianapolis Public Schools seven years ago, he seemed to have the confidence and determination to steamroll through the changes the district badly needed.

As he departs, no one can declare his tenure a clear success or failure.

Among his achievements was the proliferation of magnet schools that helped retain the children of professionals who for decades had been flocking to the suburbs.

The record is more mixed for the city’s most impoverished children, many of whom, because of complicated family lives, enter first grade already on a path to failure.

We’re disappointed that the school board this month backed away from what could have been one of White’s most important legacies, a plan to enroll 1,400 4-year-olds in free preschool—giving kids most at risk a crucial, early leg up.

It was just the kind of innovative thinking the district needed.

But unfortunately, White in many ways seemed too status quo, maintaining much of the district’s massive bureaucracy—sucking up resources that would be better deployed in classrooms—and reacting defensively to reform initiatives, including the proliferation of charters.

Some of that is understandable. It’s too early to know whether many of the initiatives former state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett championed actually will improve student performance.

And while many students who live within the IPS boundaries have benefited from having new options on where to attend school, the flight of students has exacerbated the district’s management and financial challenges.

To be sure, it takes a unique educator to run a large urban school district like IPS. Every decision can’t be the product of consensus-building and negotiation. So having a strong-willed leader at the helm is essential. But too often, especially in recent years, White’s self-certainty seemed to cross the line into arrogance and bullheadedness.

The good news is that White’s departure appears to set the stage for the broader changes we once hoped he would champion. A strong roster of new board members, including retired Indiana University Health executive Sam Odle, is poised to aggressively push reforms.

And White’s exit likely will give additional momentum to The Mind Trust’s ambitious plan, unveiled in December 2011, to blow up the bureaucracy and transform the district into a network of autonomous “opportunity” schools.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, let me say that I love the idea of communities being self-sufficient and people in the community not needing cars, living, working and shopping all in their neighborhood. To sum it up; I love good urban planning and hate urban sprawl. However, there are two reasons that I am against this development. First, this building doesn't fit. Density can occur in Ripple by building up top the street and better use of land. The scale of this project should be downtown. Secondly, I would be willing to bet that if a whole foods in Ripple is built, the Nora store would be closed. Here's my reasoning. The Nora Whole Foods expansion plans have been put on hold. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the Ripple proposal. Communities next to each other should work together to end sprawl and not work against each other and take other neighbors assets. Develop something both communities can be proud of and will attract more development and density. There's my soap box for the day.

  2. My apologies, Lou - it was the Indy Star that printed cost for entertaining "celebrities" during Indy 500. Sorry for confusing the always timely IBJ with Indy's Gannett reprint news source.

  3. That's fine if you want a grocery store that has festivals and live music. I guess with the prices they charge, they can afford to host such activities. As for me, I choose to spend my money more wisely and if I want to go to a festival or a concert, I will pay for that separately - not through my grocery bill.

  4. TIF is not just to attract development but to attract a higher use for that development. Carmel wisely is using TIF for numerous public parking garages. Asphalt seas of parking pay little taxes and bring even less value to a commercial area. Also density is what is going to save Indy and Broad Ripple. The days of trying to compete with burbs are long gone.

  5. The Prestige was an awesome movie.

ADVERTISEMENT