IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Redistricting disappoints again

 IBJ Staff
April 16, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Editorial

If anything is clear from the latest round of drawing new lines for legislative and congressional districts, it’s that the system is still broken.

Republicans, who dominate both houses of the General Assembly, have rolled out proposals to redraw the lines following changes in the census. To no one’s surprise, the new districts favor incumbents from the party or bend districts into shapes likely to be won by Republicans in upcoming elections.

It isn’t as if Democrats can claim purity. During the last redistricting, in 2001, Democrats controlled the House and drew districts favoring their party. Republicans did the same in the Senate.

These ongoing breaches of voter trust point to the need for Indiana to move to an independent commission model like the ones used in California, Iowa and many other states.

The commissions are made up of citizens appointed to take the political considerations out of the process. Even in cases where the commissions draw the maps but legislators retain authority to approve them, politicians are reticent to tinker with commission recommendations.

A proposal by House Speaker Brian Bosma and Rep. Jerry Torr of Carmel, both Republicans, to adopt the idea was short-circuited when Democrats bolted for Illinois. Democrat Vi Simpson has advocated the commission approach for years. This demonstration of bipartisan support means advocates of taking the process out of politicians’ hands should not give up.

As it stands, districts are seldom competitive, they aren’t compact, and they don’t take communities of interest into consideration. The upshot is an electorate demoralized by lack of solid choices.

Maybe it was Gov. Daniels’ threat to veto an overt run at gerrymandering, or maybe it was the progressive redistricting suggestions advanced by former Secretary of State Todd Rokita, but the proposed maps do reveal some restraint by House and Senate Republicans.

Party leaders could have drawn the maps to make legislative and congressional seats even harder for Democrats to win. As proposed, the districts would look a little more compact than the maps are today.

But the maps still protect too many Republicans, and they should be tweaked.

Marion County residents should be particularly concerned about how their proposed districts continue to be diluted by the addition of Republican-leaning bastions just outside the county.

It’s too late in the current redistricting process to expect legislators to take up the best long-term solution, an independent commission. But next year or shortly thereafter—long before the next census and the redistricting process it will trigger—legislators should act to remove themselves from the process.

The obvious conflict in allowing politicians to draw their own districts will be reason enough for some legislators to make the change. The others should remember that it’s in their self-interest to remove their opponents from the process once and for all.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT