EYE ON THE PIE: Indiana needs action, not analysis
Indiana and other states have economic incentives for businesses. We try to attract new businesses, to keep businesses here,
and to encourage existing businesses to expand. Yet we do not feel sufficiently successful. Often, we are told that our failing
is the inadequate development of entrepreneurial firms. The guys and gals with bright ideas just don't get going in Indiana.
Does our culture stifle creativity and the innovative spirit? Do our institutions make us docile and repress our flowering
potential?...
locked premium
or 
unlocked premium symbol to the right of the headline. Access
to all IBj.com Premium online content requires a paid IBJ.com Premium subscription and the subscriber to be logged in using
their email and password. See subscription options below.
on Facebook & Twitter
Back to Top
Three Magi
Cats out of the bag. The object of the game is to get acquired. That means the company has no idea how to grow beyond a certain point. Email is a 1990s technology. I have laughed at this company since day one. Such a small bit player. If it was anywhere but here, it wouldn't be newsworthy.
Esther, Indy has passed Chicago in the local government corruption arena. Don't downgrade us. We're No. 1 in the Midwest.
Does the buyer get to keep the recent Accu-Chek J.D. Power award? Be careful, those Swiss cannot be trusted. Last June they pimped Mayor Ballard and former Governor Daniels at a media op, announcing plans to invest "$300 million at its Indianapolis headquarters, creating up to 100 new jobs by 2017," only to turn around and close the Roche Nutley, NJ facility and eliminate 1000 jobs there later the same week. It seems that healthcare can be innovated only as long as money is to be made. Right now Roche seems to have big eyes for China: there are many Chinese in China and potential billions in Swiss francs! Since Roche is having difficulty with US insurance companies swallowing the bill for overpriced cancer drugs (with debatable efficacy) why not sell insurance to the Chinese and market the drugs to them there? There is a name for these sort of business practices however proper decorum precludes it use in this forum.
Same kind of Luddites who oppose I-69. Guessing their 501(c)(4) application probably sailed right through the IRS.