IBJNews

Heartland nearing $12.5 million fundraising goal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Heartland Truly Moving Pictures, whose annual film festival in Indianapolis opens Thursday, has surpassed the $10-million mark and hopes to hit its fundraising goal of $12.5 million by the end of next year.

Heartland CEO Jeffrey Sparks publicly announced the campaign, dubbed “One Film Can,” at last year’s festival. Funds from the drive will be used to expand its national outreach, and educate filmmakers and major Hollywood studios about the benefits of creating movies that emphasize the “best of the human spirit.”

The annual Heartland Film Festival awards $150,000 in cash prizes each year to independent filmmakers. With the campaign, however, the organization is looking to raise the profile of all its programs.

Heartland actually started the fundraiser in January 2008 and had already raised $7.9 million at the time of the announcement last October.

In the year since, the not-for-profit had raised an additional $2.3 million as of Aug. 31, the most recent date in which a figure was available, taking Heartland’s total to $10.2 million.

Heartland CEO Jeffrey Sparks is confident his organization can raise another $2.3 million by the end of 2012 to achieve the goal.

“We’re getting a lot closer, so I’m thrilled,” he said. “The fact that we’ve made it beyond what most festivals do gives people a real feeling that we’re going to be around for a while.”

Heartland Truly Moving Pictures this year is celebrating its 20th anniversary. The organization was founded in 1991 and operates on an annual budget of about $1.8 million.

Johnson Grossnickle and Associates in Greenwood is advising Heartland on its campaign, which is performing well despite the challenges of the economy, said Ted Grossnickle, its founder and senior consultant.

“Heartland has really done a nice job in getting its story and its mission known to many more people in the last five years who hadn’t known about it before then,” he said.

Leading donors to the fundraising campaign include the Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation, LaRita and Leland Boren and the Glick Fund. Campaign chairs are Bart and Amy Peterson and Tom and Jenny Godby.

Apart from an endowment for the film festival’s cash prizes, the money will go to the organization’s operating budget.

--$1.85 million to the Heartland Institute;

--$2.5 million to build the grassroots membership base;

--$2.3 million to increase national and local fund-raising capacity.

--$2.7 million on national advertising and marketing for the Truly Moving Picture Program.

Of the $10.2 million raised so far, however, nearly $1.4 million has been endowed to Heartland to be used over several years.

“The downside to an endowment gift is a lot of money comes in that you can’t touch,” Sparks said. “The better news is that the money’s going to be there, and it’s going to sustain the organization a lot longer.”

Nearly 130 films will be screened at this year’s festival, with five chosen to vie for a $100,000 grand prize. This year’s festival runs from Thursday through Oct. 22.

Heartland has awarded $2.3 million in cash prizes over its 20-year history.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT