What a great way to slime our public school education infrastructure: educational vouchers.
We moan and complain about schools, administrators and teachers—and of course, their cost. We change their funding
appropriation, squeezing, ever squeezing, until some school systems simply pop. Mandates—be they federal, state, county
or district—hang over administrator’s heads. Every parent wants to get the best education for their children.
Vouchers aren’t going to do this. Instead, they’re going to help destroy public schools, perhaps for generations.
Part of the vouchers rationale is an overt attempt to bust teacher unions. How droll. Teacher unions are made out to be great
blood-sucking satans, ready to wave their employment and pension contract rules in front of you, rather than educate your
children. Nothing could be further from the truth. Teachers cost money. It’s time to face that fact and attract
the best teachers we can find. Buildings don’t teach. Multimillion-dollar football stadiums don’t teach. Teachers
teach. And they cost money.
I watched my six brothers and sisters, along with my six children and stepchildren, make it through Indiana public school
systems. They’ve done very well. Their list of accomplishments is long. The Indiana Legislature slaps the very face
of every hard-working teacher, administrator and student by embracing the thought that people will run like there’s
a fire from the public school systems into the waiting arms of “better schools.”
Somehow, a local reality distortion field appeared that proffered the mistaken belief that education is like business and
can be outcomes-based, as though children were little profit centers. Educational processes aren’t like business
processes. Educational goals are unique to every individual and are measured using a vastly different set of metrics and personal
motivations.
Since the inception of the great state of Indiana, we’ve guaranteed a free and public education to students. In Indianapolis,
we finally delivered that guarantee in the 1970s to African-American students by desegregating Indianapolis Public Schools.
An opposition platform to busing to achieve desegregation at that time was known as the “Neighborhood Schools”
platform. School vouchers have a chance of backsliding desegregation, as especially in the surrounding counties, neighborhoods
are mightily segregated. Welcome back, Jim Crow.
I arrived into this life on the day when the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its Brown vs. Kansas City Board of Education
decision, which declared that the tenet of separate-but-equal education was unconstitutional. Vouchers are highly likely to
fragment education “purchases” into racial and socio-economic factions. Part of the gift of public—and
therefore publicly funded—education is to be with people who aren’t like you, from different cultures and backgrounds,
and later in college education, different communities, states and countries. Don’t even think about the constitutionality
of using vouchers for parochial schools. We’ve been through that.
Our Stars-and-Bars legislative mentality would have us decimate public schools, bust those pesky unions and spawn dozens
of schools—rather than uplift our investment in public schools by giving them needed and consistent funding and mission.
We might do the public-school constituents a favor and fund teacher and administrator pensions, but that might be asking too
much. Heaven forbid that we should raise taxes to meet our pension-funding needs in the way Illinois has done.
Instead, let’s show Illinois businesses how cheap it is to be in Indiana. We don’t need any of those pesky obligations
funded. We squeeze schools until our children are stupid enough to work in your factories for minimum wages! No goals toward
environmental responsibility and sustainability here. Just park your business and we’ll be happy to leech our little
crumbs from the taxes your employees will have to pay.
The mind reels.•
__________
Henderson is managing director of ExtremeLabs Inc., a Bloomington computer analysis firm.

















IBJ Conversations
64 Comments
Add Comment
Has anyone thought about the effects of the voucher system? This is a system set up to basically fund private schools with public money! Should public money go to private schools? How long until the government tells them what to do? When this happens there won't be any private schools.
Black Bart seems to be the Black sheep!
This whole thing is so obvious. The republicans want to just break the unions. Rush stated on his program yesturday that the teachers union gives x amount of money to the democrats. So, if the republicans can break the unions then the democrats won't be able to receive any money from them. SO WERE THE REPUBLICANS PUT IN OFFICE TO MAKE SURE DEMOCRATS DO NOT RECEIVE MONEY BECAUSE THIS IS THE ONLY THING THEY ARE WORKING ON?
I am a public school teacher in southern Indiana. Would you grant us permission to submit your article for print in our local paper? http://www.dcherald.com and http://www.ferdinandnews.com Thank you for a great article!
At what point, I wonder, did education turn from caring about children-children in the classrooms to caring about adult-children in the teachers unions?
Illinois had horrible difficulties, and some of them led to needing to raise taxes. Mark my words: we'll need to find some way to meet our obligations that will hurt, because we've been putting off pension funding in a way that's completely insane. Want to change them? Fine, but a deal is a deal, and we're obligated to our word and should put our money where our word is.
Enter charter schools - parents, once faced with no choice but to continue send their children to the same failing school - now have an OPTION to go elsewhere.
This is what scares the teachers unions so much - CHOICE! It's a novel concept and I'm not surprised to see it roundly criticized by a whole host of entrenched interests.
Of course the author can't resist the temptation to make this a race issue, with not one bit of evidence to show why expanding choice would result in increased segregation. In fact, the likely result is that many low-income minorities will now be able to attend high performing schools that are majority-white. Why are you so set to keep those less fortunate locked into the same failing school systems. The mind reels.
Kudos to the governor, our legislators and education superintendent for thinking outside of the box and granting families a release from their educational prison.
Children aren't profit centers, and enlightened education success mandates motivation, aspiration, accommodating diverse needs, and having a carrot at the end of a stick. Punishing public schools isn't the answer. Seeking complex guidance to difficult and sophisticated problems takes brainpower, not market-based education is the start to turning around public school outcomes. One mountain at a time.....
pathetic student achievement. Place the blame where most of it belongs---on the students' shoulders. What a novel idea. The last ISD of Ed Superintendent was a farce and this new one is even worse. I happen to be a Republican, also. They both are duping our legislators about Education.
Unions have with the demise of our system, too. My school system lowered its standards seven times in thirty years. Not a thing I could do about it. Good luck with your pursuit.
I'm so tired of teachers being the only people blamed for poor student performance. So very tired of it. When, oh, when are we going to hold the parents/household environment at least partially accountable for a student's lack of progress? Children at home 18 hours of every school day, after all, and all weekend, and all those vacation days out of school.
Of the top 100 schools, one is a charter school...in Columbus. This is Mr. Daniel's improvement plan?
You can check this info on the DOE website...unless Mitch has directed Tony Bennett to edit the data.
The voucher money will also be available for church schools. I understood that the US Constitution in the greatest country on Earth prohibited this.
Between many various religious affiliations and many new charter schools, how factionalized will Indiana become? This is in a tough times when we need to be working together to move our state forward.
This plan will direct needed money away from the public schools where 90% of Indiana kids attend, and send it to schools where 10% of Indiana students attend. It amounts to an elitist plan which will create special schools for "gated communities".
Public schools are currently the one place where affluent kids learn how to work with people of different socio-economic and culture groups. They will need this experience in the workplace and in life.
PLEASE FORWARD MR. HENDERSON'S ARTICLE TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW AND CONTACT YOU STATE LEGISLATORS OF BOTH PARTIES!
maybe mitch needed a better education himself. he's the one who had estimated the cost of the iraq war at 50 to 60 billion when working in the bush admin, as the White House Office of Management and Budget Director. Seems like it's too late for him.
agree 100% that the main problem is with these folks' view that almost every institution should be run like a business. once loyalty is to profit, all other relationships take second place. as the one to your community, city, state, country, and all its children. and their education. and these are the folks who like to run on patriotism.
The conclusion I reached is simply this I cannot teach them if they are not there and cronic absence issues are destroying us all.
Open your eyes folks. Education is too complex of an issue to solve through such business-centered models. Also, Governor Daniels, you seem to believe that the teachers and unions are resistant to change. Remember, change isn't always for the better when ill-conceived. Think health care.
I can only speak for my own township, but we are facing just as many obstacles as IPS. Budget cuts, AYP mandates (with no funding), overcrowded classrooms, and narrowing curriculum to "focus on the test."
This is not helping our students become engaged and productive members of our community.
Today's students need smaller class sizes so that they can build stronger relationships with overworked teachers.
Teachers need to be seen as the committed professionals that they are. Sure, there are teachers that are not up to par - but these teahchers also exist within private and charter schools. Taking funding away from schools that primarily serve our marginalized students is not going to fix this problem.
Until all of our public schools are on equal footing, funds should not be diverted to schools that face decreased regulation (and produce no better results).
It's tough enough in the schools as is. We get the students we get, and for their presence the school (and district) gets funding.
Take out those who can afford the exodus away from public instruction, and our schools and systems become that much weaker. It's a no brainer, sort of what appears to now sit at the top of Hoosierville's government. Your situation is now very sad, and we can only hope "the Indiana people" will find a way to overcome the absurdity, not further destroying the educational system in Indiana, while perhaps enticing other politically-motivated state "leaders" to follow suit.
I'm proud of my Indiana education, but am truly heartbroken for the little Hoosiers on the way up (or "trying" to be on the way up).
I am considering moving back to Indiana from Arizona and am concerned about what I will find. I was publically educated at North Central and IUPUI and had fantastic teachers/professors. These educators are smart and if you "move their cheese" they will follow and you will have small charter schools popping up right and left that will not uniformally properly educate the youth of the state. Meanwhile the state will be depleting the public school system of quality teachers and funding. Simple question legislators: How can this be good? Not sure I want to sing "Back Home Again in Indiana" under those circumstances.
It's not enough that I worry about sending two of our four children to college, have a child in high school, and one in junior high. It's not enough that I worry about paying the "deductibles" on our ever increasing health insurance and prescription costs ... did I mention that my spouse is disabled? It's not enough that I worry about the students that I teach who come to me with very serious problems at home. Now, I can also worry about my job, as the sole bread winner in our household. Thank you, Governor Daniels, that you have confirmed what my counselor has been telling me for over a year ... my life is filled with toxic stress. Yes, it exists, and it exists right here in Indiana. I've always been proud to be a Hoosier and call Indiana home.
Thank you Mr. Henderson for writing the article. At least someone out there cares. It is not our Governor or Superintendent of Schools.
Tom
I have a PhD student daughter, another stepson that will become one, and I'm proud of each child. They've all done well; they received the preparations that they craved. Now it's up to them..... and us. We've got to shake the Stars and Bars attitude.
Tom
As a special education teacher and administrator for 25 years, I cannot tell you how much my heart jumps for joy that there is someone else out there who "gets it"!!! You 'get' that our children are not like a business and cannot be treated as profit and loss margins on a business report, or as you said...there education cannot be "outcome based" and merit determined by standardized testing alone.... I have used those exact words so many times over the past several years, and to my dismay and sadness, our governor, state superintendent, along with the legislature and department of education, simply do not "get it". Your article is right on, I applaud you,thank you, and you have my support and vote should you ever decide to run for governor of this great state of ours!!
To the point and so very true.
Your frustration at current events is palpable when reading your article.
You are not alone.