IBJNews

HHGregg reports higher profit, lower same-store sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Soft demand for pricier televisions and appliances led Indianapolis-based HHGregg Inc. to slash its fiscal 2011 outlook on Tuesday after missing quarterly sales estimates.

The company’s profit in its fiscal third quarter increased 18.4 percent from the same period in 2009 due in part to the opening of four new stores.

For the quarter ended Dec. 31, HHGregg earned $26.9 million, or 66 cents per share, compared with $22.7 million, or 57 cents per share, in the 2009 period.

But same-store sales, which reflect revenue from stores open at least a year, fell 6.2 percent. Overall revenue in the quarter increased 30.6 percent, to $653.7 million, missing analysts’ estimates of $654.6 million.

“Through our fourth fiscal quarter to date, we have continued to see challenging top-line results due to industry headwinds along with experiencing the negative effects of inclement weather across our chain during our important Super Bowl selling season,” said Jeremy Aguilar, HHGregg’s chief financial officer, in a prepared statement.

For fiscal 2011, the company now forecasts profit in a range of $1.10 a share to $1.15 a share, down from its previous outlook of $1.15 to $1.23. Same-store sales are expected to fall 4 percent to 5 percent, worse than the prior estimate of 1 percent to 3 percent.

The company still remains on track to open a total of 43 new stores in fiscal 2011.

“We continue to be pleased with our new-store sales productivity and our team’s execution in both new and existing markets,” HHGregg CEO Dennis May said in a statement. “As a result, we remain confident in our ability to continue to gain market share as we enter new markets and move closer to becoming a national retail chain.”

HHGregg operates 174 stores in 15 states.

Company shares opened trading Tuesday morning at $18.67 each. By late morning, they had fallen more than 6 percent, to $17.51.


 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT