Higher payroll taxes take toll on restaurants

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Pete Giokaris sees an upside to higher payroll taxes.

The owner of Flanagan's Restaurant & Pub in Fort Wayne said business is up 11 percent so far this year, and he attributes it partly to people looking for more affordable places to dine.

"We have a very good price point," he told The Journal Gazette. "You can get a meal for $8 to $12. I've been getting feedback from regulars, and they're saying they used to go to other places but have been coming to us because we're affordable."

However, according to a Nation's Restaurant News poll, eateries experienced the worst same-store sales decline in three years in February. Sales fell 1.8 percent. Bad weather is an easy scapegoat, but the effect of the payroll tax can't be overlooked, said Larry Miller, an analyst for Nation's Restaurant, a New York trade publication.

The survey questioned 49 restaurants regarding February sales, profit trends, performance and outlook. Respondents included operators from all regions of the country that represent the quick-service, casual-dining, fine-dining and fast-casual segments.

At the beginning of the year, the fiscal cliff deal failed to prevent a 2-percentage point increase in the payroll tax. This meant $32.75 less per check for an average private-sector worker who makes $820 a week and is paid every other week.

"Weather certainly played its part in the drop in industry sales in February, but it's becoming clearer to us that the payroll tax is affecting sales, too," Miller said in a statement. Even so, he said, business is expected to pick up once spring temperatures return.

John Livengood, president and CEO of the Indiana Restaurant & Lodging Association, hopes that's not wishful thinking. So far, 2013 has been "a roller coaster ride," with the group's members saying sales are up and down.

"People are going to eat out," but when disposable income shrinks, they become selective, he said.

"They're looking for places with that fast-casual concept," Livengood said. "That's why you're seeing so many restaurants improving their menus."

An example is Taco Bell's new Cantina Bell menu, which aims to snag customers from places like Chipotle.

The quality of casual dining is what keeps customers at Friends and Friends Too, owner Niko Hatzigeorgiou said.

"We always try to be competitive with our prices," said Hatzigeorgiou. "We're doing as much as we can. Business has been steady."

Fort Wayne resident Chris Connelly wishes his family's income was the same. The 37-year-old said his family is dealing with less pay. Connelly is a sales and distribution manager for Pepsi. His wife is a medical technician.

"Once the summer gets going and I start getting overtime, I probably won't notice [the payroll tax]," Connelly said. "My wife only works part time, and she's noticed it the most."

So, how will their family of five deal with its dining-out habits?

"We're seeing that you don't always have to get an extra-large pizza and you don't always need a soda," Connelly said. "Little things like that will help in cutting back what we spend."


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now