IBJNews

Home construction weak both locally, nationally

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Home-building permits filed in the Indianapolis area fell by more than 30 percent in January compared with the same month in 2010, mirroring a national trend showing weak demand for new single-family houses.

In the nine-county Indianapolis region, the number of building permits filed last month fell to 198, a decline of 31 percent from January 2010, according to the latest permit data from the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis.

Home-building activity was down in every area county last month except Johnson, where 25 building permits were filed, an increase of 25 percent from the same time last year.

Just 30 building permits were filed in Marion County, a decrease of 25 percent.

Home construction was strongest in Hamilton County, though the number of building permits fell by 20 percent, to 90.

Housing construction actually rose nationally last month at the fastest rate in 20 months because of a big spike in apartment building. But construction of single-family dwellings declined.

Builders broke ground on new homes and apartments at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 596,000 units, a 14.6-percent jump from December.

Single-family homes, which make up nearly 70 percent of new construction , fell 1 percent, to an annual rate of 417,000 units. Apartment construction skyrocketed 80 percent, to an annual rate of 171,000 units.

Building permits, an indicator of future construction, fell more than 10 percent nationally in January.

Last year, U.S. builders worked on 587,600 new homes, just barely better than the 554,000 started in 2009. In a healthy economy, builders start about 1 million units a year. The housing industry is coming off the worst two years for home construction dating back to 1959. Central Indiana home bulders also suffered through two tough years.

More than a year after the recession ended, the housing market is still struggling.

Millions of foreclosures have forced home prices down and more are expected this year. Tight credit has made mortgage loans tough to come by. And some potential buyers who could qualify for loans are hesitant to enter the market, worried that prices will fall further.

The flat-lined housing market is weighing on the overall economic recovery. Each new home built creates, on average, the equivalent of three jobs for a year and generates about $90,000 in taxes, according to the National Association of Home Builders.

The trade association reported Tuesday that its index of builder confidence remained stuck at 16 in February, where it has been for four straight months. A reading of 50 signifies a positive outlook about the future.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • home construction
    Construction spending, an important driver of the economy, has been in freefall for months. The construction sector has gotten so weak, spending in Feb. reached its lowest level since the fall of 1999. Foreclosures and short sales are the primary culprit, as they stifle new home building, the traditional driver for the entire sector . The proof is here: Construction sector continues to hold back more robust recovery
  • I Agree with Joe!
    There have been 400 new apartments proposed for downtown indy over the past week and the Riley area is building three new apartment complexes... More people were buying homes than could afford them so home sales may be slow for decades to come. Almost 70% of our pop was owning homes... That is very impressive, but also what drove us into this whole problem. If home sales sky rocket again then we are going to be in a world of hurt.
  • Wrong indicator
    Stop citing new home construction as a sign of the economy. That is the exact issue that got us into this mess. We put 'em up as quick as we can and then have to sell them off to people that can't really afford a huge house. Our existing housing stock can support our population, what will happen when we build out? I know it seems so far away, but at the current rate we will eventually have no room. Development in many areas has grown twice as fast than population if not more. What do we expect to happen? This mentality of more is more can't be sustained. I would consider a home remodel more important than a new home. Reinvestment in a community shows signs of improvement. Building new homes shows that we are too weak to support a population for a given period of time.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The deductible is entirely paid by the POWER account. No one ever has to contribute more than $25/month into the POWER account and it is often less. The only cost not paid out of the POWER account is the ER copay ($8-25) for non-emergent use of the ER. And under HIP 2.0, if a member calls the toll-free, 24 hour nurse line, and the nurse tells them to go to the ER, the copay is waived. It's also waived if the member is admitted to the hospital. Honestly, although it is certainly not "free" - I think Indiana has created a decent plan for the currently uninsured. Also consider that if a member obtains preventive care, she can lower her monthly contribution for the next year. Non-profits may pay up to 75% of the contribution on behalf of the member, and the member's employer may pay up to 50% of the contribution.

  2. I wonder if the governor could multi-task and talk to CMS about helping Indiana get our state based exchange going so Hoosiers don't lose subsidy if the court decision holds. One option I've seen is for states to contract with healthcare.gov. Or maybe Indiana isn't really interested in healthcare insurance coverage for Hoosiers.

  3. So, how much did either of YOU contribute? HGH Thank you Mr. Ozdemir for your investments in this city and your contribution to the arts.

  4. So heres brilliant planning for you...build a $30 M sports complex with tax dollars, yet send all the hotel tax revenue to Carmel and Fishers. Westfield will unlikely never see a payback but the hotel "centers" of Carmel and Fishers will get rich. Lousy strategy Andy Cook!

  5. AlanB, this is how it works...A corporate welfare queen makes a tiny contribution to the arts and gets tons of positive media from outlets like the IBJ. In turn, they are more easily to get their 10s of millions of dollars of corporate welfare (ironically from the same people who are against welfare for humans).

ADVERTISEMENT