IBJNews

Hostess to cut wages for Indiana bakers in labor deal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Hostess Brands Inc., the maker of Twinkies and Wonderbread, has received the go-ahead from a U.S. bankruptcy court judge to cut wages for thousands of bakery workers, affecting more than 400 employees in Indiana.

Hostess, based in Irving, Texas, on Wednesday won approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York to impose changes to collective-bargaining agreements for members of the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers & Grain Millers International Union.

Changes to the agreements included an 8 percent decrease in wages for the first year of a five-year contract, according to the company.  Wages would rise about 3 percent the following year. The agreements also would include revised health and welfare benefits, and/or employee cost share.

Hostess filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization in January. It argued to the bankruptcy court that cutting wages for all workers—including the BCTGM members—was the only way to avoid going out of business.

Members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters had ratified similar changes to their collective bargaining agreement with Hostess in September. BCTGM members voted to reject the company’s proposed concessions, leading to the court action.

Hostess employs 874 workers in Indiana, 436 of which are members in the BCTGM union, according to Hostess spokesman Erik Halvorson. The firm employs 288 workers in its Indianapolis bakery, of which 212 are BCTGM members.

In a letter to Hostess workers dated Aug. 20, Rayburn emphasized that all employees—including management—would be subject to the pay cuts absorbed by union members.

“With lower costs, we can attract the financing we need to exit Chapter 11, invest in our operations and create a company with a sustainable long-term future,” Rayburn said.

Hostess was founded in 1930 and has annual revenue of more than $2 billion. It employs about 18,500 workers, which operate 36 bakeries and 570 bakery retail outlets nationwide.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. RKW's comments read like a modern "Chicken Little". As a Raintree resident for many years, "Yes, I'm ready for this." Matter of fact, I welcome The Farm because it's a development that compliments our town, brings new and desirable shopping & dining closer (specialty grocer, upscale shops, micro brew pub, etc), offers upscale condos for empty nesters who want to stay in Zionsville, is being planned and constructed by local, well-reputed firms and, of course, provides desirable non property tax benefits. We all knew the Pittman's were going to develop their property sooner than later. That one of the Pittman's will continue to live on the property helps assure The Farm will be everything promised. This also sets a standard for other developers as to the quality of future developments - which should keep an ugly Walmart at bay for decades. As we've no meglomaniac mayor, I seriously doubt Zionsville would ever aspire to over-priced statues or subsidized retail rents. And we already have a very nice public theater, the Zionsville Performing Arts Center, that meets our cultural needs quite nicely.

  2. Do we add (or subtract) these from the bounty we recieve from RTWFL, Daylight Savings Time, corporate tax giveaways, and the crack job IEDC is doing?? Or is Mike going to blame these on Mitch?

  3. Who makes Tater Tots? They would be a good sponsor, because $3 Million for the alleged "Greatest Spectacle In Racing" is taters. Tiny, tiny taters. But at least they are making up something of the losses accumulated over the years in this dying sport. Buttock in seat is certainly not doing it, nor eyeball on TV, as evidenced by the lack of both.

  4. We loved lakehouse and think the Arbor Village would be a great location. It is less than 2 miles from over 1000 rooftops in the 225,000 to over 1 million range. Many people could use the great fishers trail system to bike or walk there. Just an idea Scotty -- but maybe something closer to 3 Wiseman would good. The only microbrew in area is Ram (boring)

  5. True, it's an ESPN production, but ESPN is just another name for ABC Sports, or what used to be ABC Sports since ABC Sports no longer exists as a name. ESPN=ABC Sports= ESPN. ESPN is, according to Forbes "the world's most valuable media property" worth $40 billion. Despite that, they fired 400 people this week.

ADVERTISEMENT