IBJNews

Indiana panel OKs overhaul of school grading system

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Sweeping changes to Indiana's A-to-F ranking standards for public schools have been approved despite complaints that the new rules are too complex for schools and parents to understand.

The State Board of Education voted 6-2 Wednesday for the changes. The overhaul means the grading scale for Indiana's schools will now be attached to a new evaluation system that gives schools more credit when students' test scores grow faster than their peers, The Indianapolis Star reported.

The changes also add new measures to gauge how well schools prepare students for college and careers.

A wide spectrum of educators and education-focused groups opposed the rules, however, calling them too complex. They also said one growth measure was potentially unfair to schools.

Board members said that while the system is not perfect, it provides more information and greater flexibility than the old system.

State schools superintendent Tony Bennett said complexity could not be avoided in getting a deeper understanding of school performance. Bennett also said the new policy is flexible and will allow education officials to "go back and revisit them" to make later changes.

Indiana replaced its school rating categories with A to F grades last summer, though the methods used to rank schools remained unchanged for 2011. Bennett had promised an overhauled school rating system for this year, and the changes approved Thursday spell out the criteria or logic used to determine each of those grades, said State Department of Education spokeswoman Stephanie Sample.

Indiana's public schools will get their first letter grades based on that new criteria this fall. The grades will reflect schools' performance during the 2011-12 school year, Sample said.

Indiana also sought a waiver from the accountability requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind law in its pursuit of creating a new system for judging school quality. The state submitted its new A-to-F proposal to show how it planned to do so.

Indiana is also implementing "common core" standards that will be shared by 45 other states and eventually bring new tests that could replace ISTEP, the state's standardized achievement test.

The new system is built on three primary test factors that judge if students have reached proficiency, how much they improved and how their growth compared to other students on their testing level.

But the growth measure has proved controversial.

Based on ideas borrowed from Colorado, it only gives students credit for "high growth" if their gain is better than two-thirds of all students at their testing level. Because this measure is percentage based, only a third of students will be able to reach it — no matter how much their scores go up.

Some educators worry that could handicap some schools if their students make solid growth but growth across the state is even better.

State Board of Education member Mike Pettibone raised that concern, saying the state should want a student's test scores to reflect at least a year's gain over a year's time.

But the model would allow students to be labeled "high growth" with less than a year's gain in test scores if students across the state did poorly in general. Or they could miss out on being labeled "high growth" even if they made more than a year's gain if students statewide scored higher than usual.

Board member David Shane argued that the system's advantages outweigh those weaknesses.

"I'm not sure I love all of it but I find it intriguing that schools are being judged on how well they got their kids to learn," he said.

Board member Jo Blacketor said she was most concerned by reports that schools and parents had difficulty understanding how their schools received their grades. A simulation of the new system saw some grades jump or fall dramatically.

Blacketor said A-to-F was supposed to be easier for parents to understand, not harder.

"It is not transparent to the general public," she said. "It is not simple. It is complex."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Message to Jerry
    If you try to understand our State House, you will get a headache, and quickly give the who lot of them an "F". We will soon have a "Pass / Fail System" which will evolve toward "Everyone Passed, everyone is good, and the world will no longer have hunger. Look, no impact on the budget. What about the folks looking for work? Zap, they all Pass! Give them a job that does not require reading skills. Who was working on jobs and the economy? Whoops, I guess that committee "Failed".
  • Why?
    Is it just me, or does it seem that the legislature is getting involved in an awful lot of topics that in no way improve the economic health or current issues affecting Hoosiers? It's starting to feel like a political power trip coming out of our statehouse!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

    2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

    3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

    4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

    5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

    ADVERTISEMENT