IBJNews

Indianapolis Air Show called off; organizers cite sequestration

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

This year’s Indianapolis Air Show has been called off, event organizers said Tuesday, citing the potential impact of the federal government’s looming sequestration as the reason.

The air show was set for June 15-16 at Indianapolis Regional Airport near Mount Comfort east of Indianapolis. It has taken place annually since 1996 and draws up to 100,000 spectators.

The show’s executive committee made the decision to cancel this year’s event.

“Due to budget uncertainties resulting from the threat of sequestration and its impact on military participation at our show, all of which are beyond our control, we have been forced to make the very difficult decision to cancel the 2013 Indianapolis Air Show,” said Robert Duncan, chairman of the show’s executive committee, in a prepared statement.

About $85 billion in federal budget cuts are set to take effect Friday. The cuts were designed as a strategy to bring Democrats and Republicans to the negotiating table on a deficit-reduction plan. But without an agreement, the cuts, known as the sequester, are poised to take effect.

Air show organizers were not immediately available to comment on whether the event could be rescheduled if the federal government reaches a compromise by the end of the week.

The U.S. Navy Blue Angels had been scheduled to appear at the show, but military jet teams are grounded until further notice, and additional military support
for air shows also has been suspended.

Several other air shows throughout the nation have been canceled as well, Duncan said.

Proceeds from the event have resulted in more than $1.3 million being donated to local not-for-profits such as the Central Indiana Community Foundation, air show organizers said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What Else Can We Cut?
    The Blue Angels budget annually is $37,000,000.00. This bill is footed by the american tax payer. For what reason? How many other bogus programs are out there that the american tax payer never even really thinks about? We can, and should, start cutting all of this fluff out of the annual budget. This is another reason why tax payers can't trust the government to spend our money wisely. And another reason I fine with the "sequestration".
  • Who Pays?
    Steve makes a good point. If the gate fee does not pay for the Blue Angels time I assume the tax payer is footing the bill for fuel, man hours, etc. to fly these really expensive jets. So, since 1996 $1.3MM has been raisd for local charities. How much has it cost tax payers to pay for the Blue Angels over that same period of time? Also, haven't we lost a number of these jets in air shows around the country due to accidents? At $50MM a plane plus paying for fuel and man hours I know I can do without a governement funded air show.
  • Really??
    How bout some support for that whopper of a comment Tim?
  • So who pays for the Blue Angels to come?
    Does that mean the show gate doesn't actually pay for the Blue Angels to do a show?
  • Spending Cut
    Please get the spending cut correctly. Only 15% of the Budget the discretionary amounts can be cut. 85% manadatory (ie medicaid medicare social security military pay) cannot. So it is NOT 2%. Look at your home budget. If you get a 20% loss of income you can't just pay 80% of your mortgage or heat bill. There are only certain things you can cut.
  • vacation
    I wonder how many of these high profile cuts could be saved if the president wouldn't take 100 million dollar vacations each year?
    • Great Knee Jerk
      Clearly this was a knee-jerk reaction. If the Air Show cannot sustain itself as a stand alone, then it should be cancelled completely. The budget reduction for the Navy's Blue Angels is minimal at best, however I continue to question the need for a flying circus act supported by DoD Funding. Throughout all of the discussion process, I have not once heard a Member of Congress, a Member of the US Senate, or the President offer to reduce their salaries and Office Budget Payments until a balanced budget is secured. If our government was run like a business instead of appearing as a Kindergarten Class, perhaps they would realize that funding for two wars and the deployment of US Troops worldwide is an expenditure that should be curtailed permanently. As a nation, we have lost our moral compass and the ability to focus on the needs of our own citizens rather than spreading foreign aid, which appears to be failing rather than helping. With all due respect to those elected to represent us, they should go home and not return until they grow-up.
    • Air Show Committee
      The Air Show obviously have no proactive members that are willing to or have the firtitude to do a show without the possibilty if the Blue Angels. Civilian shows are STILL very popular and even if it is a smaller show, people woukd still support it! The Obama administration scare tactics i see are working well in Indiana. All this media hype that the sky is falling is just a bunch if bull. HELLO. This is a 2.4 % cut in what had already jumped over a whopping 14% over the last four years!
    • Pick the cuts to generate the most PR
      The sequestration cuts amount to 2% of the entire budget if all enacted this year - which they are not. To generate the most attention let's pick spending with the largest public impact. Let's not be manipulated again.
    • The well runneth dry!
      Great! Finally less government spending. They need to cut off funding to NPR and Public Television as well.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT