IBJNews

Insurer tapping Super Bowl to continue ad campaign

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance is hoping to score again during Sunday’s Super Bowl with the latest installment in its popular “Stop Knocking on Wood” television advertising campaign.

Farm Bureau, Indiana’s second-largest auto and homeowner’s insurer behind State Farm, used the game two years ago to kick off the campaign.

Two 30-second commercials this year airing before and after the game will be broadcast throughout Indiana on affiliates of CBS, which is televising the matchup between the Baltimore Ravens and San Francisco 49ers.

Super Bowl advertising is among the most-anticipated elements of the televised game. Some national spots this year are fetching a record $4 million each, far more than the five-figure investment Farm Bureau has made to run its ads.

The results have been well worth the investment, the Indianapolis-based company says. Property and casualty policies written by the insurer have increased nearly 25 percent in the past two years and life insurance premiums rose almost 40 percent in 2012 alone.

Indianapolis ad agency Young & Laramore is the creative force behind the advertisements.

“The insurance industry has become very competitive,” agency President Tom Denari said. “A lot of money is being spent with our competitors, so we have to keep these fresh and entertaining, and somewhat humorous.”

Insurers spend more than $5 billion a year on personal auto insurance advertising and marketing. And just four companies—State Farm, Allstate, Geico and Progressive—account for more than half the spending, according to J.D. Power & Associates’ 2011 Insurance Shopping Study.

The creativity of the ads, featuring geckos, mayhem and a pitchwoman who charmingly stalks patrons, forced Farm Bureau to ditch its “we’re part of your life” campaign for something a little more memorable.

So the insurer tapped Young & Laramore to build brand awareness and land customers outside its leading share in the farm-owner’s market. The focus with the ads is on metropolitan areas such as Indianapolis, Fort Wayne and South Bend, said Melissa Mann, Farm Bureau’s manager of advertising and brand strategy.

“As we enter our third year, it’s really starting to establish some legs, if you will,” she said of the campaign. “When we launched, we weren’t even on the radar.”

The ads feature folks who aren’t knowledgeable about their coverage and simply hope for the best—thus the “Stop Knocking on Wood” theme.

Farm Bureau first posed real-life scenarios, such as what’s covered if an automobile is stolen or a wedding ring lost, and followed last year by quizzing consumers about their policies.

The three 30-second ads this year will tackle auto and renters' insurance and what can happen when a consumer doesn’t know what his policy covers.

In one spot, for instance, newlyweds drive away from a church in a banged-up car as the voiceover says, “If your auto policy doesn’t cover it, you might have to live with it.”

Based on the results of the past two years, Denari expects Farm Bureau to continue its partnership with Young & Laramore on the campaign.

“It really hits on the way people feel about insurance,” he said. “There are no indications that tell us, ‘Hey, this is not working.’”
   
Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance employs 1,200 people in Indiana and wrote $498 million in premiums in 2011.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT