IBJNews

Insurer tapping Super Bowl to continue ad campaign

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance is hoping to score again during Sunday’s Super Bowl with the latest installment in its popular “Stop Knocking on Wood” television advertising campaign.

Farm Bureau, Indiana’s second-largest auto and homeowner’s insurer behind State Farm, used the game two years ago to kick off the campaign.

Two 30-second commercials this year airing before and after the game will be broadcast throughout Indiana on affiliates of CBS, which is televising the matchup between the Baltimore Ravens and San Francisco 49ers.

Super Bowl advertising is among the most-anticipated elements of the televised game. Some national spots this year are fetching a record $4 million each, far more than the five-figure investment Farm Bureau has made to run its ads.

The results have been well worth the investment, the Indianapolis-based company says. Property and casualty policies written by the insurer have increased nearly 25 percent in the past two years and life insurance premiums rose almost 40 percent in 2012 alone.

Indianapolis ad agency Young & Laramore is the creative force behind the advertisements.

“The insurance industry has become very competitive,” agency President Tom Denari said. “A lot of money is being spent with our competitors, so we have to keep these fresh and entertaining, and somewhat humorous.”

Insurers spend more than $5 billion a year on personal auto insurance advertising and marketing. And just four companies—State Farm, Allstate, Geico and Progressive—account for more than half the spending, according to J.D. Power & Associates’ 2011 Insurance Shopping Study.

The creativity of the ads, featuring geckos, mayhem and a pitchwoman who charmingly stalks patrons, forced Farm Bureau to ditch its “we’re part of your life” campaign for something a little more memorable.

So the insurer tapped Young & Laramore to build brand awareness and land customers outside its leading share in the farm-owner’s market. The focus with the ads is on metropolitan areas such as Indianapolis, Fort Wayne and South Bend, said Melissa Mann, Farm Bureau’s manager of advertising and brand strategy.

“As we enter our third year, it’s really starting to establish some legs, if you will,” she said of the campaign. “When we launched, we weren’t even on the radar.”

The ads feature folks who aren’t knowledgeable about their coverage and simply hope for the best—thus the “Stop Knocking on Wood” theme.

Farm Bureau first posed real-life scenarios, such as what’s covered if an automobile is stolen or a wedding ring lost, and followed last year by quizzing consumers about their policies.

The three 30-second ads this year will tackle auto and renters' insurance and what can happen when a consumer doesn’t know what his policy covers.

In one spot, for instance, newlyweds drive away from a church in a banged-up car as the voiceover says, “If your auto policy doesn’t cover it, you might have to live with it.”

Based on the results of the past two years, Denari expects Farm Bureau to continue its partnership with Young & Laramore on the campaign.

“It really hits on the way people feel about insurance,” he said. “There are no indications that tell us, ‘Hey, this is not working.’”
   
Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance employs 1,200 people in Indiana and wrote $498 million in premiums in 2011.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT