IBJNews

ITT Educational OKs bonuses to keep managers in place

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel-based ITT Educational Services Inc.’s management team will get special cash bonuses if they remain with the company until the end of June, ITT disclosed in a regulatory filing last week.

Chairman and CEO Kevin M. Modany would get the biggest boost—nearly $1.2 million—if he stays at the helm through June 27, 2011. His compensation totaled $7.6 million in 2009, the latest year for which figures are available.

Other top managers are set to receive six-figure cash infusions: $324,000 for Chief Financial Officer Daniel M. Fitzpatrick; $319,000 for General Counsel Clark D. Elwood; $295,000 for Eugene W. Feichtner, president of the ITT Technical Institute division; and $263,000 for June M. McCormack, president of ITT’s online division.

ITT's offices were closed Monday, spokeswoman Lauren Littlefield said in an e-mailed response to a request for additional information on the newly approved bonuses.

But in a Dec. 23 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, ITT said its board’s compensation committee approved the bonuses “in order to help motivate and retain those executives“ and recognize their “extraordinary efforts” as the company and its for-profit peers have come under fire from federal officials.

New student-lending rules scheduled to go into effect in mid-2011 are expected to pinch profits by restricting access to federal loans—which now account for about 80 percent of ITT’s nearly $1.6 billion in annual revenue.

The U.S. Department of Education unveiled data in July showing that only 31 percent of former ITT students have repaid or are paying down their federal loans four years after leaving, suggesting their time at the school did not lead to “gainful employment.”

Analysts say ITT would likely have to cut prices, raise admissions standards or even eliminate some programs to meet the new standards, which likely would reduce its $375 million annual profit.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • it seems ITT is not interested in education, just money
    I am going to have to say that these bonuses are a bunch of bull. These key executives have been employed by ITT from a couple of year to several years. I do not see any of them leaving any time soon at the money they are making and at the ease that they are making it. I would have to say that a majority of the money that ITT makes is off of federal founding and it is federal money that is paying these people.

    ITT preys on those people that have no money so that they can get their hands on the Pell Grants and Stafford loans that their students qualify for. These student would be those that have been out of work so long that their taxes show they have no income, people on disability, single parents, and those that may be receiving military benefits. You see the cost of ITT is so high that a substantial amount of potential students would not be able to afford the out of pocket expense or even qualify for any private financial aid.


    ITT has does not care about the type of student they enroll. They have no standards other than a high school diploma or GED. Some of these student could barely get there high school diploma or GED. And they are asking them to invest in an education that they will fail at because they lack the background or even will power to even be successful.

    So if you ask me, these top executive are receiving money from the federal government. I would compare this to the bonuses that were handed out to bank executives during the bailout, money that is intended to help but used for the wrong purposes.

    But that is capitalism.
  • Lay-offs
    You see this a lot when a company is about to lay-off a large segment of their employees. Kaplan and U of P did this before laying off 600 and 800 of their admissions employees, respectively. If I was an admissions representative for ITT, I would update my resume
  • itt
    ITt is a fraud school every one pass deans falsify grades and attendance records lie about transfer credits forge entrance exams.
  • Immoral
    It is a crime that these executives are paid so much when such a small percentage of ITT students get decent jobs. No wonder these kind of sleazy schools have come under fire. They ought to be closed down.
  • Stock plummets, get reward
    So they get a bonus to stay at their job. Isn't that called a paycheck. This is pointless. Let's see how the stock did, down 50% good job, here is a lot of money to make you feel better and a press release to blame the bad performance on the government.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT